chiptune covers are now so ubiquitous as to be the equivalent of typing "<song name> dubstep remix" into you tube.  if we want to be the comedy clowns of music styles then keep on with it.

calmdownkidder wrote:

tldr - butthurt because guy doing faux-chiptune covers and getting press isn't "one of us".

point missed, congratulation.

The only coverage we get are chip covers albums, which people rant about on here and yet continue working on more of them.  So it's not the magazine's fault it's yours.

tbh not having a chip community locally means you're less likely to play only chip shows filled with other chip musicians.  it's not really broadening your appeal doing that.

tumbleweed.jpg

and a "last 10 songs streamed" box for the music on-site.  would probably get the numbers up as I doubt anyone trawls through all the new releases.

7

(21 replies, posted in Bugs and Requests)

ok. 0xAnything because the aesthetic doesn't care about hardware.

TSC wrote:

Yes, and small demos. I'll shoot a video tonight of the c64 running JCH.

I have experienced a few larger demos not running, but I don't remember these running with a stock 1541 anyway. Most of everything I've personally tried to run has worked.

were they PAL demos by any chance?  not many of those will run on NTSC especially ones with loaders.

fakebit

10

(8 replies, posted in General Discussion)

12

(21 replies, posted in Bugs and Requests)

I have visions of (4xDMG,3xLSDJ,8xC64) approaching....

problem is if we open source everything we can't send "fuckingz to lamers" anymore.  what do we fill the scrolltexts with?

(A JOKE)

under $50 ($0) and on pc: forget me not

yeah it's "the new era of open-ness" for demoscene I guess.  though if you want to know how something is done you'll usually get a reply on pouet or CSDB.

stop relying on hardware X and go back to pure wave theory?  lot of potential there.