The new download link works, thanks.
I was hoping for a more readability-focussed font, but I like this general aesthetic too. It reminds me a lot of the classic artwiz-aleczapka fonts. I've had a look through, mostly concentrating on the glyph forms. I don't see support for much of the Unicode range, only Basic Latin, Latin-1 Supplement and Latin Extended-A. Is this all that's included, or is this an encoding issue (probably at my end)? It's nice to see that those ranges are fully supported, though (except for a missing glyph at U+017F). What follows are some notes I made looking through the glyphs.
Glyphs
U+0030 DIGIT ZERO is not distinguishable from U+004F LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O; perhaps dot the zero?
U+00BF INVERTED QUESTION MARK, your glyph is mirrored in the y axis from what it should be.
U+00AA FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR has an underbar, but U+00BA MASCULINE ORDINAL INDICATOR lacks one.
U+00F0 LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH shows a miniscule eth (with missing crossbar), but all your other SMALL letters show majuscule forms.
U+010B LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE shows an acute, not a dot.
Your breves look like carons, but I'm being fussy here.
U+010F LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH CARON shows an odd variant, not the same as the majuscule form.
U+0123 LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CEDILLA; as above.
U+0165 LATIN SMALL LETTER T WITH CARON; as above.
U+017F LATIN SMALL LETTER LONG S is missing, but Latin Extended-A is otherwise complete.
Cosmetics
U+003A COLON and U+003B SEMICOLON don't have the same dot-spacing.
U+00C6 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER AE has funny proportions.
U+0108 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CIRCUMFLEX, the circumflex alignment looks slightly odd in running text.
U+0134 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER J WITH CIRCUMFLEX, the circumflex alignment looks odd in isolation, but alright in running text.
U+0162 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T WITH CEDILLA, the cedilla doesn't match your other cedillas, which are otherwise consistent.
