<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Milkytracker VS Fastracker 2]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://chipmusic.org:80/forums/feed/atom/topic/1028/"/>
	<updated>2010-03-24T12:33:08Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/1028/milkytracker-vs-fastracker-2/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Milkytracker VS Fastracker 2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16397/#p16397"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FT2 is not so easy to run on the modern PCs, and DosBox is simply slow. So, if you don&#039;t have old enough PC with MS-DOS or Windows 9x, you have to choose from modern trackers. If you&#039;ve liked FT2, your options are Sk@le or Milky. In my opinion, Milky is more suitable for chip music, because it has sample drawing tool, so you can create all your samples from scratch, instead of ripping from other&#039;s modules or generating them in external software.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Shiru]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Shiru</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-24T12:33:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16397/#p16397</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Milkytracker VS Fastracker 2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16272/#p16272"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I prefer Milky because of it being cross platform. I can run it in my Mac or PC indistinctly (and my Mac G3 makes a great tracking machine <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" />).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[akira^8GB]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/akira%5E8GB</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-23T14:27:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16272/#p16272</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Milkytracker VS Fastracker 2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16256/#p16256"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Apparently FT2 and Milky handle vibrato way differently. Other than that it merely comes down to what you&#039;re comfortable with/learned first.</p><p>Also, FT2 has nibbles <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[PlainFlavored]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/PlainFlavored</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-23T12:04:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16256/#p16256</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Milkytracker VS Fastracker 2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16218/#p16218"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>MilkyTracker is cross-platform, and FastTracker2 is DOS (although I suppose it could be run in DOSBox which is cross-platform too). Personally I think Milky would be easier to use (I&#039;ve never used FT2).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tacticalbread]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/tacticalbread</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-23T03:40:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16218/#p16218</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Milkytracker VS Fastracker 2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16217/#p16217"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A conversation in IRC about the merits of Milkytracker and FT2 prompted me to wonder if anyone has any preference for one over the other and if so why? I am learning Milky and rather enjoying it. Just curious if there were any specific reasons to choose one over the other?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Lazerbeat]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Lazerbeat</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-03-23T03:38:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/16217/#p16217</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
