your basically un supporting yourself for somebodys proffit.
I am sure we can look past the pure shit cover art to appreciate the music you gave to us.
or you can share it with us digitally because we don't own cd burnerz
]]>However, the product pages are quite confusing. I can't seea purchase button anywhere :\
]]>]]>Decktonic wrote:Um I looked into Kunaki and they have a legit CD manufacturing facility so these are NOT CD-Rs.
I'd say it's most likely CD-Rs.
The quantities they produce are no where near enough to warrant cutting a die for.
I was just about to say the same. A glass master cost a few buckzzzzz..
]]>hotmessization wrote:How's the playback? I imagine this uses CD-Rs and not real CDs.
Um I looked into Kunaki and they have a legit CD manufacturing facility so these are NOT CD-Rs.
I'd say it's most likely CD-Rs.
The quantities they produce are no where near enough to warrant cutting a die for.
]]>hotmessization wrote:How's the playback? I imagine this uses CD-Rs and not real CDs.
Um I looked into Kunaki and they have a legit CD manufacturing facility so these are NOT CD-Rs.
I had one of my old old EPs made with Kunaki and it is a CD-R (green bottom). This was 2008 so maybe it's changed since then, but.
]]>
.]]>How's the playback? I imagine this uses CD-Rs and not real CDs.
Um I looked into Kunaki and they have a legit CD manufacturing facility so these are NOT CD-Rs.
]]>yeah the marbled vinyl is cheap cause its the scraps from making other people's records
i knew that but didn't know about the shit quality. 
low-gain wrote:i'd rather pay a little more for quality than get cheap vinyl.
the last thing i want are my records being played out after only a few plays.
on top of that.. low-end is typically lost on cheap vinyl... i refuse to sacrifice quality just cuz it costs less. even if i have to sit on 100 of the 300 i pressed.this is why im skipping on using marbled vinyl, its just a rough trade off to save 15% or so on the pressing and have a reduction in quality, when the high quality is a key benefit to vinyl over other formats to begin with
man i never knew the quality dropped with marbled vinyl. 
octavialsilver wrote:jeff, just get marbled vinyl as it's cheaper. price them accordingly and its worth it in the end, and by that i mean you wont lose money.
i'd rather pay a little more for quality than get cheap vinyl.
the last thing i want are my records being played out after only a few plays.
on top of that.. low-end is typically lost on cheap vinyl... i refuse to sacrifice quality just cuz it costs less. even if i have to sit on 100 of the 300 i pressed.
this is why im skipping on using marbled vinyl, its just a rough trade off to save 15% or so on the pressing and have a reduction in quality, when the high quality is a key benefit to vinyl over other formats to begin with
]]>DJCactus wrote:i hear that, detroit has a few places that cut, but its not even worth the money.
jeff, just get marbled vinyl as it's cheaper. price them accordingly and its worth it in the end, and by that i mean you wont lose money.
i'd rather pay a little more for quality than get cheap vinyl.
the last thing i want are my records being played out after only a few plays.
on top of that.. low-end is typically lost on cheap vinyl... i refuse to sacrifice quality just cuz it costs less. even if i have to sit on 100 of the 300 i pressed.