<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> 2013-11-02T21:39:48Z PunBB https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/12567/worst-trackers-to-start-chiptuning-with/ <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> lvlzero wrote:

protrekkr. very convulted for me. I don't get how people say it is similar to renoise, I see easier to use renoise than protrekkr

agree

this was my first tracker and look how i turned out

]]> https://chipmusic.org/sandneil 2013-11-02T21:39:48Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189715/#p189715 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> sandneil wrote:

its not necesarily about difficulty eh

Interesting. What don't you like about it?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/defiantsystems 2013-11-02T20:50:48Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189697/#p189697 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> protrekkr. very convulted for me. I don't get how people say it is similar to renoise, I see easier to use renoise than protrekkr

]]> https://chipmusic.org/lvlzero 2013-11-02T18:33:39Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189641/#p189641 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> its not necesarily about difficulty eh

]]> https://chipmusic.org/sandneil 2013-11-02T16:35:35Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189631/#p189631 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Renoise? Really? Is it that hard? As someone who now exclusively uses Renoise I find this hard to believe.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/defiantsystems 2013-11-02T15:44:32Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189621/#p189621 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> renoise

]]> https://chipmusic.org/breakfastsquid 2013-11-02T14:51:48Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189616/#p189616 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> 4mat wrote:

so-called "fakebit" is where all the innovation is these days.

I agree lol was just being facetious}:A

]]> https://chipmusic.org/SJSFC 2013-11-02T14:51:07Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189615/#p189615 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Sheet music >: |

]]> https://chipmusic.org/MisfitChris 2013-11-02T14:50:24Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189614/#p189614 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> so-called "fakebit" is where all the innovation is these days.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/4mat 2013-11-02T14:43:49Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189613/#p189613 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> renoise. only because it's so easy and fun that by the time you're finished your chip track, you're already well into the fakebit territory big_smile

]]> https://chipmusic.org/SJSFC 2013-11-02T14:33:49Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189612/#p189612 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Dasm

]]> https://chipmusic.org/4mat 2013-11-02T14:00:19Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189609/#p189609 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Try the tracker, Tao from CreamHQ uses. Ridiculously complex.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/xylo 2013-11-02T09:12:08Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189595/#p189595 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Renoise can get complicated, i suggest you start with something easier

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Orin 2013-11-02T06:51:25Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189594/#p189594 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Not a tracker, but easy to use without manual DanceEjay! big_smile

]]> https://chipmusic.org/bowie 2013-11-02T06:06:15Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189592/#p189592 <![CDATA[Re: worst trackers to start chiptuning with??]]> Sup4durt wrote:

I've tried SunVox ones; WAAAAAY to much option in there. Couldn get anything out of it.

SunVox is honestly the easiest tracker I've ever used

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Cooshinator 2013-11-02T04:38:03Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/189589/#p189589