<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> 2010-01-10T01:51:52Z PunBB https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/172/a-layout-more-suited-to-longterm-browsing/ <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> DaPantz wrote:
minusbaby wrote:

peeeeeeoooooooWIP!

I have to go now. My planet needs me.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Subway+Sonicbeat 2010-01-10T01:51:52Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/2004/#p2004 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> BACK ON TOPIC :3

CDK, you could have worded that better like :
- a layout more suited to browse you long time

]]> https://chipmusic.org/George 2010-01-10T00:46:28Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1974/#p1974 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]>

]]> https://chipmusic.org/minusbaby 2010-01-10T00:36:53Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1970/#p1970 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> minusbaby wrote:

peeeeeeoooooooWIP!

I have to go now. My planet needs me.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/DaPantz 2010-01-10T00:34:09Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1965/#p1965 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> Facebook status update:
heart James Bentley is now in a long-term relationship with chipmusic.org

]]> https://chipmusic.org/akira%5E8GB 2010-01-10T00:31:07Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1962/#p1962 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> WHY I OUGHTA

]]> https://chipmusic.org/calmdownkidder 2010-01-10T00:13:59Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1947/#p1947 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> George wrote:

I think he wants to marry the forum.
I have to say, it's nice and sexy, so it's understandable...I guess.

(Perv!)


can i give away the bride (CDK)?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/infradead 2010-01-10T00:10:51Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1946/#p1946 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> I think he wants to marry the forum.
I have to say, it's nice and sexy, so it's understandable...I guess.

(Perv!)

]]> https://chipmusic.org/George 2010-01-10T00:09:15Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1944/#p1944 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> peeeeeeoooooooWIP!

]]> https://chipmusic.org/minusbaby 2010-01-10T00:02:43Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1939/#p1939 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> calmdownkidder wrote:

JEEZ GUYS I JUST MEANT LONG SESSIONS OF BEING ON THE FORUM

I'll give you a long session.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Trash80 2010-01-10T00:01:31Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1938/#p1938 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> JEEZ GUYS I JUST MEANT LONG SESSIONS OF BEING ON THE FORUM

]]> https://chipmusic.org/calmdownkidder 2010-01-10T00:00:41Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1937/#p1937 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> I like long-term browsing. Can we get a trademark on that?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/goatslacker 2010-01-09T23:55:24Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1935/#p1935 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> calmdownkidder wrote:

1280x1024 isn't that too obscure/high a resolution in 2010, surely?

That depends on the screen size. But also, maybe your blind. wink

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Trash80 2010-01-09T23:20:51Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1911/#p1911 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> 1280x1024 isn't that too obscure/high a resolution in 2010, surely?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/calmdownkidder 2010-01-09T23:18:28Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1908/#p1908 <![CDATA[Re: A layout more suited to long-term browsing?]]> Yeah your problem is you have one of those gigantic laptop with the too-high of a resolution for the screen size eh? just do the whole Ctrl + to increase the size

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Trash80 2010-01-09T23:04:36Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/1900/#p1900