<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://chipmusic.org:80/forums/feed/atom/topic/18289/"/>
	<updated>2016-04-26T05:55:08Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/18289/labels-for-the-more-prog-side-of-chip/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243310/#p243310"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Same. My aim for this project is three or four long (10–20min) pieces that traverse various styles such as prog metal, synthwave, art-rock, new age/ambient, experimental/musique concrete.. with common musical themes/motifs to tie the disparate styles.. so in other words, a load of self-indulgent wank, but prog as fuck</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pselodux]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/pselodux</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T05:55:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243310/#p243310</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243307/#p243307"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>&quot;impenetrable&quot; is actually a quality i find very appealing in music, although &quot;opaque&quot; is usually the word that comes to mind. i can&#039;t be the only one out there with a taste for that sort of thing</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jangler]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/jangler</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T04:22:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243307/#p243307</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243304/#p243304"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>yeah I made a decision earlier this year to do that rather than try to please people. Unfortunately though, that means just writing the most ridiculous prog stuff that is possibly fairly impenetrable, hahah. Having said that, my minimal tech youtube videos have been taking off a little lately so maybe I&#039;ll just ride the success of those and keep chugging away at prog stuff in relative secrecy.. the way it should be <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pselodux]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/pselodux</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T04:01:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243304/#p243304</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243298/#p243298"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>pselodux wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>haha yeah, fair enough. Perhaps I&#039;ll just do some pandering chip EDM for a while so I can get popular and then unleash my mega prog epics on an unsuspecting fan base <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p></blockquote></div><p>Life&#039;s too short for that, just make what you like making.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[chunter]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/chunter</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T01:38:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243298/#p243298</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243297/#p243297"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>egr wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m not saying this to be a smartass but if there happened to be a prog chip label at the moment it would be one that you&#039;d never heard of which means either they&#039;re extremely new or just awful at promotion. Either way I don&#039;t think you&#039;d benefit.&nbsp; /$0.02</p></blockquote></div><p>haha yeah, fair enough. Perhaps I&#039;ll just do some pandering chip EDM for a while so I can get popular and then unleash my mega prog epics on an unsuspecting fan base <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pselodux]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/pselodux</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T01:29:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243297/#p243297</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243296/#p243296"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>10k wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>stuff</p></blockquote></div><p>Good to see you around.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[chunter]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/chunter</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T01:22:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243296/#p243296</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243294/#p243294"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not saying this to be a smartass but if there happened to be a prog chip label at the moment it would be one that you&#039;d never heard of which means either they&#039;re extremely new or just awful at promotion. Either way I don&#039;t think you&#039;d benefit.&nbsp; /$0.02</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[egr]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/egr</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-26T01:04:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243294/#p243294</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243290/#p243290"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Calavera wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Just do what everyone else does and start your own <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /><br />That way you&#039;ll never be rejected again!<br />Plus it sounds like the world needs a chip-prog label.</p></blockquote></div><p>haha, well I have the tsr &#039;label&#039; already, but that&#039;s for minimalist stuff (so minimal it hasn&#039;t had a release yet!), certainly not the ridiculously dense prog I&#039;ve been working on for my pselodux project <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pselodux]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/pselodux</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T23:59:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243290/#p243290</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243289/#p243289"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Perelandra?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[danimal cannon]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/danimal+cannon</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T23:58:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243289/#p243289</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243288/#p243288"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Just do what everyone else does and start your own <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /><br />That way you&#039;ll never be rejected again!<br />Plus it sounds like the world needs a chip-prog label.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Calavera]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Calavera</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T23:55:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243288/#p243288</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243287/#p243287"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>herr_prof wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>RIP Pause.</p></blockquote></div><p><a href="http://www.iimusic.net/" target="_blank">http://www.iimusic.net/</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[10k]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/10k</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T23:51:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243287/#p243287</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243286/#p243286"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ubiktune got back to me, they don&#039;t accept demos anymore. Not sure if this means they won&#039;t be taking more artists on at all, but either way I managed to fail to get their attention. I guess I&#039;m missing something about just being &#039;poached&#039; by a label.. Perhaps I&#039;ll submit one of my new prog tracks to the chipwin compilation and hope someone proggy gets into it.</p><p>Or perhaps I&#039;ll just contact &#039;real&#039; prog labels <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pselodux]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/pselodux</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T23:35:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243286/#p243286</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243276/#p243276"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>ubiktune! that crew knows how to shred hard</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[an0va]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/an0va</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T22:48:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243276/#p243276</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243272/#p243272"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>aanaaanaaanaaana currently only releases music in secret</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[aanaaanaaanaaana]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/aanaaanaaanaaana</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T22:41:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243272/#p243272</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Labels for the more "prog" side of chip?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243270/#p243270"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>nickmaynard wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>maybe this is a side discussion but this is something I&#039;ve always wondered about with net labels. what are they getting in exchange for releasing and promoting your music? do they get a cut of the profits?</p></blockquote></div><p>chipmusic is generally not a profitable endeavor</p><p>maybe some labels take a cut, but every label i&#039;m aware of also has plenty of free releases in their catalog. i think chip labels are mostly motivated by a desire to curate and share cool music</p><p>except for aanaaanaaanaaana, which is motivated by a dog</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jangler]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/jangler</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-04-25T22:38:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/243270/#p243270</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
