the artist has to do some pretty crazy stuff to make just one console sound full.
That depends on what "full" means to you. The ability to have two notes at a time create a song that sounds complete is an important compositional skill, even if you never get good enough at it to release the results. If you mean the frequency spectrum, that's as simple as playing a square wave at full volume.
]]>But also, if only one console sounds too thin, you're doing only one console wrong.
I've heard some pretty impressive one-console stuff, but the stuff the artist has to do some pretty crazy stuff to make just one console sound full. The artists who can pull off that sort of thing are the exception.
]]>instead of tables, renoise has phrases.
sunvox also has phrases, inside metamodule.
But also, if only one console sounds too thin, you're doing only one console wrong.
]]>Renoise is great. I record more in Renoise than I do in Reaper lol. Try out the demo, it gives you everything except exporting to .wav (Honestly, you can get around this if you really want to, but I suggest supporting the dev team. They're a great group).
I used the demo of Renoise from about 2007 to 2011 I think, then I bought a license. Worth every penny. I love the way their license system works compared to other DAWs (I respect Reaper's pricing model, too. Very fair). You buy a license and you're good from the current version up to the next full version. So right now you'd buy at version 3.1.x and be good until 4.1.x and that takes a long, long time. I bought at 2.9 I think and it's been nearly 5 years now. Even in that time there have been plenty of changes and updates, but they don't go up the version numbers too fast unless there's a big, big change in features.
I hear what you're saying but I have a long way to go before understanding using stuff like that. Its all sample based is it not? LSDJ was my very first exposure to using trackers whatsoever and my abilities with that isn't super great (probably evidenced by the music I've posted here.) Getting good things out of tables for example is a struggle for me, but at least I dont have to find samples since it has built in synthesis. I was considering moving into famitracker to learn something a little "bigger" that also has some built in synthesis. At any rate, yes, I'll play with Renoise.
]]>I used the demo of Renoise from about 2007 to 2011 I think, then I bought a license. Worth every penny. I love the way their license system works compared to other DAWs (I respect Reaper's pricing model, too. Very fair). You buy a license and you're good from the current version up to the next full version. So right now you'd buy at version 3.1.x and be good until 4.1.x and that takes a long, long time. I bought at 2.9 I think and it's been nearly 5 years now. Even in that time there have been plenty of changes and updates, but they don't go up the version numbers too fast unless there's a big, big change in features.
]]>Does anyone else use traditional DAWs and overdubbing in making chip music?
I use Renoise in this way, though when I have moments of self-doubt, I wonder if people think I do it just to be able to post music here and not because I actually wanted to.
]]>Chiranjeevi is pretty awesome, but thats tollywood...from andra pradesh
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W9mf72vp24E
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_k4LOoYA1vw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lWz7Li4mlKA
chiranjeevi's producer is awesome.
]]>Sorry for slightly jacking your thread for a moment there Dolby-Z. Back to your point, everything you are saying, I agree with you 100%. I rather believe your original point is something that separates more talented 'composers' from simple 'beat makers' like myself. Whole world of difference in overall listening experience certainly.
]]>the bollywood breaks tune enduser..
that EP is great, was the first stuff of his i heard... the one time i played a gig with him, i actually ended up doing his visuals because no carrier needed to rest a little since the show ran from 8pm to 6 am
]]>