<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - GBC vs GBP]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://chipmusic.org:80/forums/feed/atom/topic/18469/"/>
	<updated>2016-05-21T07:18:41Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/18469/gbc-vs-gbp/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244224/#p244224"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The frontlight isn&#039;t really that bad for the GBC--you can still use it in broad daylight too, so that&#039;s a nice plus. Though I only have AGS-001 modded GBCs and not the Kitsch+LOCA variants...</p><p>Also, pay attention to the CPU revision of the GBC (if you&#039;re planning to go for that path) and make sure it&#039;s a -04 or -05. I&#039;ve had nasty experiences with other revisions (-02 kept killing notes that used P and V commands).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[GammaBlaster]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/GammaBlaster</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-21T07:18:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244224/#p244224</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244210/#p244210"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m biased towards the GBC but I would recommend it. Especially if the DMG is having trouble keeping up with your tracks. I started off using a DMG but it kept blowing out because most of the tracks I was working on were 208 bpm</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Starshine]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Starshine</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-20T17:36:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244210/#p244210</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244172/#p244172"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>nanode wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>urbster1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>gb player. but it&#039;s not portable.</p></blockquote></div><p>GBP = Gameboy Pocket</p></blockquote></div><p>yes i was aware of that</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[urbster1]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/urbster1</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T18:56:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244172/#p244172</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244170/#p244170"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Timbob wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>if form is important, build an SP into a DMG shell.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;d like to keep my sanity thanks <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[nanode]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/nanode</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T18:51:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244170/#p244170</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244169/#p244169"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>urbster1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>gb player. but it&#039;s not portable.</p></blockquote></div><p>GBP = Gameboy Pocket</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[nanode]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/nanode</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T18:50:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244169/#p244169</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244167/#p244167"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>gb player. but it&#039;s not portable.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[urbster1]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/urbster1</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T13:01:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244167/#p244167</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244161/#p244161"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>If your DMG can&#039;t keep up, the GBP won&#039;t either, since the processor / speed is the same.<br />Form factor is the only difference between those two. (And some small other things.. Sounds a bit different etc)</p><p>If you need faster processing you should go for GBC or GBA /SP</p><p>And if form is important, build an SP into a DMG shell.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Timbob]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Timbob</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T06:19:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244161/#p244161</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244157/#p244157"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I love and use all three.&nbsp; Each has it&#039;s own strength&#039;s and weakness&#039;.</p><p><a class="postimg" href="http://www.absolutextremes.com/All3GBs.jpg" title="PunBB bbcode test" id="forum_image_93872999"><img src="http://www.absolutextremes.com/All3GBs.jpg" /></a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DSC]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/DSC</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T02:55:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244157/#p244157</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244155/#p244155"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>pselodux wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yeah I&#039;d go for GBC over GBP. </p><p>Have you considered a GBA though? SP perhaps?</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve highly considered them but I hate their form factors.</p><p>The GBA is hard to use because of the janky select button placement and the SP can only go out through a 3rd party connector and it&#039;s a clamshell.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[nanode]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/nanode</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T01:23:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244155/#p244155</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244154/#p244154"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#039;d go for GBC over GBP. </p><p>Have you considered a GBA though? SP perhaps?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pselodux]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/pselodux</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T01:05:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244154/#p244154</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244150/#p244150"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>GBC goes faster.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Knife Crimes]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Knife+Crimes</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-18T00:04:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244150/#p244150</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[GBC vs GBP]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244149/#p244149"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey all!</p><p>So I&#039;m about to plan out my first mod because it&#039;s been 3 years of me sittin here twidlin my dick tryin to make music and my shit keeps breaking.</p><p>I really like the DMG, but it&#039;s falling behind on me and can&#039;t keep up with my workload. Slowdowns, skipped notes, etc...</p><p>I&#039;ve heard that the GBC is a great option, but they only lighting option is a frontlight that imho looks awful. On the other hand, the GBP has a similar form factor and the ability to be backlit, but I don&#039;t know what the speed of the processor is and if it would even be able to handle my workload. There&#039;s also very little documentation I&#039;ve been able to find on the hardware of the system itself.</p><p>So, does the z80 compare better, worse, or equal to whatever the fuck the GBP has?</p><p>Thanks!<br />-Sam</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[nanode]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/nanode</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-17T23:41:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/244149/#p244149</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
