<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://chipmusic.org:80/forums/feed/atom/topic/2168/"/>
	<updated>2010-08-21T05:02:26Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/2168/ntrq-vs-famitracker/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35856/#p35856"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I like famitracker because i&#039;m good with tracker interfaces, but NTRQ is a bit crazy with it all jam-packed into one screen. they both have their ups and downs. The end result is pretty much the same, like Heosphoros said</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Apricorn]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Apricorn</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-21T05:02:26Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35856/#p35856</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35851/#p35851"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>hotmessization wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>NTRQ</p><p>Until they make a native Mac version of Famitracker, then I&#039;m all over it.</p></blockquote></div><p>I think this is what sold me too... Running CrossOver or Wine to run Fami just doesn&#039;t go smooth enough.</p><p>Plus NTRQ is more visually appealing I think.</p><p>Neil, you win this round...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[SnuGG]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/SnuGG</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-21T03:54:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35851/#p35851</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35697/#p35697"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>an-cat-max wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Beware wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>PPMCK is clearly the right decision.</p></blockquote></div><p>thisguy.nsf</p></blockquote></div><p>i laughed with my mouth closed cause there&#039;s macaroni in there</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Saskrotch]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Saskrotch</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-20T03:22:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35697/#p35697</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35692/#p35692"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>NTRQ</p><p>Until they make a native Mac version of Famitracker, then I&#039;m all over it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hotmessization]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/hotmessization</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-20T02:49:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35692/#p35692</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35686/#p35686"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Emar wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>lol what would you gaiz do if JSR was posting in this thread too? <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p></blockquote></div><p>fuck yes i call death fight: jsr vs baldwin</p><p><div class="embed_video"><iframe width="560" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-DEd4IFbJYk" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe></div></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[irrlichtproject]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/irrlichtproject</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-20T02:29:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35686/#p35686</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35685/#p35685"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>SnuGG wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Reply with what you think is better and why please!</p></blockquote></div><p>They are both amazing trackers. They have their own strengths and it wouldn&#039;t feel right to blindly recommend one over the other. <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>If you&#039;re used to other PC-based trackers, famitracker will likely be the one that&#039;s easier to get into. Having more screen space, along with a mouse and keyboard, means working in an environment that&#039;s probably more familiar to you. I would likely recommend famitracker to someone who is more comfortable with a tracker like modplug, for example. One pro for famitracker over NTRQ is its support for various sound expansion chips and its built-in wav to .dmc converter.</p><p>NTRQ is a badass tracker that runs natively on the system or in an emulator, as it is an actual .NES ROM. Its functionality is nothing short of impressive. It&#039;s loaded with the features and effects you&#039;d want, it can even pitch-slide arpeggios (I don&#039;t believe famitracker can do this). It is very advanced and won&#039;t disappoint in terms of &#039;I wish I could do this&#039;.&nbsp; I would likely recommend NTRQ first to someone who may be more comfortable with something like LSDJ. </p><p>So it mostly comes down to a preference of interface and aesthetic. If you&#039;d like to compose on the actual system with an NES controller in your hand, there&#039;s NTRQ. If you prefer using a mouse and keyboard and windows, there&#039;s famitracker. If you have no starting preference and want to give one a shot, I recommend trying both.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bucky]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/bucky</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-20T02:26:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35685/#p35685</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35678/#p35678"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>lol what would you gaiz do if JSR was posting in this thread too? <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /></p><br /><br /><p>p.s.&nbsp; I like both trackers <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Emar]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Emar</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-20T01:59:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35678/#p35678</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35665/#p35665"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>arfink wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>neilbaldwin wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yeah, right on brother!</p><p>Hang on, which one is NTRQ?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yours is a triple-decker deep dish pizza with everything on it.</p></blockquote></div><p>i&#039;d say ntrq is more of a sandwich, many things squeezed between two slices of bread. at first it&#039;s hard to get a bite out of it, but once you get past that part it can be quite delicious. famitracker is clearly the kleenex, not really an essential thing but convenient to have.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[irrlichtproject]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/irrlichtproject</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-20T00:30:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35665/#p35665</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35611/#p35611"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beware wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>PPMCK is clearly the right decision.</p></blockquote></div><p>thisguy.nsf</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[an-cat-max]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/an-cat-max</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T20:47:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35611/#p35611</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35538/#p35538"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>neilbaldwin wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>irrlichtproject wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>1. beautifully said, heos.</p><p>2. nerdtracker is the only real nes tool anyway.</p><p>3. mr snugg, look at it that way: what&#039;s better, a pack of kleenex or a slice of bread? depends on whether you&#039;re hungry or your nose is dripping, doesn&#039;t it?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, right on brother!</p><p>Hang on, which one is NTRQ?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yours is a triple-decker deep dish pizza with everything on it.<br />BTW, did blargg PM you yet Neil?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[arfink]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/arfink</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T17:15:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35538/#p35538</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35537/#p35537"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>PPMCK is clearly the right decision.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beware]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Beware</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T17:11:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35537/#p35537</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35536/#p35536"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>irrlichtproject wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>1. beautifully said, heos.</p><p>2. nerdtracker is the only real nes tool anyway.</p><p>3. mr snugg, look at it that way: what&#039;s better, a pack of kleenex or a slice of bread? depends on whether you&#039;re hungry or your nose is dripping, doesn&#039;t it?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, right on brother!</p><p>Hang on, which one is NTRQ?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[neilbaldwin]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/neilbaldwin</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T17:09:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35536/#p35536</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35529/#p35529"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>1. beautifully said, heos.</p><p>2. nerdtracker is the only real nes tool anyway.</p><p>3. mr snugg, look at it that way: what&#039;s better, a pack of kleenex or a slice of bread? depends on whether you&#039;re hungry or your nose is dripping, doesn&#039;t it?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[irrlichtproject]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/irrlichtproject</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T16:41:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35529/#p35529</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35523/#p35523"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to keyboard vs controller, I choose controller.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[egr]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/egr</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T16:17:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35523/#p35523</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: NTRQ vs FamiTracker]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35520/#p35520"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a golden tree. A tree that bares various forms of fruit, but the end taste is always the same. The only difference is how you eat the fruit. </p><p>The NES is the Tree. The fruits are the various ways to make NSF. </p><p>No debate, just delicious fruit.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Heosphoros]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Heosphoros</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-08-19T16:06:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/35520/#p35520</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
