<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> 2010-12-18T22:12:48Z PunBB https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/2982/nanoloop-12-for-nanoloop-13-or-23/ <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> e.s.c. wrote:
*E wrote:

If you know someone who has a 1.3 cart, there's a way to upgrade your 1.2

Maybe someone on the site could do it for you if you ship it to them (or you could send it to Oliver)

untrue
you can upgrade a 2.2 to 2.3
1.2 uses sram powered by battery and saves 4 banks and uses 3 channels, 1.3 uses flash memory and saves 16 banks and has 4 channels

I stand corrected, thanks for the clarification

]]> https://chipmusic.org/%2AE 2010-12-18T22:12:48Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49117/#p49117 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> i'd love to get my 1.2 cart back... i miss that version. totally kick ass kicks. smile

]]> https://chipmusic.org/low-gain 2010-12-18T16:44:35Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49106/#p49106 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> *E wrote:

If you know someone who has a 1.3 cart, there's a way to upgrade your 1.2

Maybe someone on the site could do it for you if you ship it to them (or you could send it to Oliver)

untrue
you can upgrade a 2.2 to 2.3
1.2 uses sram powered by battery and saves 4 banks and uses 3 channels, 1.3 uses flash memory and saves 16 banks and has 4 channels

]]> https://chipmusic.org/e.s.c. 2010-12-18T14:28:11Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49103/#p49103 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> If you know someone who has a 1.3 cart, there's a way to upgrade your 1.2

Maybe someone on the site could do it for you if you ship it to them (or you could send it to Oliver)

]]> https://chipmusic.org/%2AE 2010-12-18T13:42:42Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49102/#p49102 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> blargh asdf

]]> https://chipmusic.org/an0va 2010-12-17T18:51:22Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49051/#p49051 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> <-- not it hmm

]]> https://chipmusic.org/facundo 2010-12-17T15:56:26Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49044/#p49044 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> to who? yikes

]]> https://chipmusic.org/nordloef 2010-12-15T21:20:26Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48870/#p48870 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> gone.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/an-cat-max 2010-12-15T19:44:32Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48859/#p48859 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> Private Messaged.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Esopus-dragon 2010-12-13T00:24:08Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48642/#p48642 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> you can just mail me the cart for christmas

]]> https://chipmusic.org/facundo 2010-12-08T16:25:19Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48308/#p48308 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> kitsch wrote:

PM'd

pm'd back :3

]]> https://chipmusic.org/an-cat-max 2010-12-07T23:15:37Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48247/#p48247 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> SAMWAVE wrote:

How much for either 1.2 or 1.3?

i'm looking for a 1.3 not selling one and i'd rather trade if possible.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/an-cat-max 2010-12-07T23:13:33Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48246/#p48246 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> PM'd

]]> https://chipmusic.org/kitsch 2010-12-07T23:01:27Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48245/#p48245 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> How much for either 1.2 or 1.3?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/SAMWAVE 2010-12-07T22:56:06Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48244/#p48244 <![CDATA[nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> gone.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/an-cat-max 2010-12-07T22:52:08Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48243/#p48243