<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - New to the Forum]]> 2011-02-10T10:54:54Z PunBB https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/3408/new-to-the-forum/ <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> godinpants wrote:
Smendrick the Magician wrote:

Were all in it for the bleeps.

I'm more for bloops

UP WITH BLEEPS! DOWN WITH BLOOPS!

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Decktonic 2011-02-10T10:54:54Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55364/#p55364 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> Thanks for the kind words everyone smile
Don't feel worried about how I make music anymore. Some places I have been in the past have been really snobbish about it but it's good to know it's about the music and not the way that it's made that is important here.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/pyEss 2011-02-10T06:47:44Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55345/#p55345 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> welcome. dont worry about what you use to make music, if its good its all good. most of the older people in the scene use trackers mainly because its faster, but because you can get more ideas out too and a lot of the tracker guys (myself included) feel using a gameboy is antiquated. doesnt make anybody better or worse, but you'd be hard pressed to find a bad musician or songwriter in this scene.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/tempsoundsolutions 2011-02-10T04:37:43Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55322/#p55322 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> Smendrick the Magician wrote:

Were all in it for the bleeps.

I'm more for bloops

]]> https://chipmusic.org/godinpants 2011-02-10T02:58:35Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55311/#p55311 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> Hello, and welcome. I am also new to the forum, but feel right at home here.
Fakebit, 8bit, all the same really. One shouldn't be frowned upon because they choose, or are limited to using software over hardware. Were all in it for the bleeps. As said before, good music is good music.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Smendrick+the+Magician 2011-02-10T02:55:34Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55309/#p55309 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> a little piece of advice... from my very small, limited experience, dont waste too much time dwelling on what you are using for music, use whatever feels comfortable enough for you... and as long as your songs are sounding nice and have an edge then its a winner, doesnt matter if you sampled your toilet flushing and made a beat out of it.

my 2 cents.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/theskyis256k 2011-02-10T02:46:32Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55306/#p55306 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> pyEss wrote:
Decktonic wrote:

I'm still confused. Is that "piss" or "peas?"

It's pee es like postalscript.

(postscript)

I thought it was fairly easy to read, but the y could throw people off.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Infininja 2011-02-10T02:21:23Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55296/#p55296 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> ant1 you are being needlessly misinforming, and in someone's introductory thread.

If software and hardware weren't interacting there would be no music.

When music is written to be played by sounds that are as limited as obsolete consoles can produce, within it's limitations, some call it fake-bit, but sonically it's no different.

When music is produced through obsolete consoles, but the expected limitations are surpassed, some would call that something, like "noise", but on the real hardware it is chip music. It will however not please those chip music fans wanting the real hardware. Ironic though.

Sometimes people just want arpeggios on pulse waves like noted video game companies put in games. This is clear outside the definition of chip music. It's barely chiptune, but that will please some chiptune fans.

There's different things to please anyone. Let them be happy with what makes them happy.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Esopus-dragon 2011-02-09T20:59:59Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55213/#p55213 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> Welcome! smile
P.s. if you need any help, p.m.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/L-tron 2011-02-09T18:43:36Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55172/#p55172 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> Heosphoros wrote:

PyEss, I love you

]]> https://chipmusic.org/e.s.c. 2011-02-09T18:32:48Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55168/#p55168 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> ^lol

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Battle+Lava 2011-02-09T16:48:29Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55113/#p55113 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> now is that a real poncho or is that a Sears poncho

]]> https://chipmusic.org/an0va 2011-02-09T16:42:33Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55111/#p55111 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> then it is fakebit duh

]]> https://chipmusic.org/ant1 2011-02-09T16:41:59Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55109/#p55109 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> ant1 wrote:
Battle Lava wrote:

First of all the game boy doesn't have a sound card.

Second, Logic is using hardware just as much as lsdj, or many other music making software, but you think logic is software and not lsdj.  So why isn't lsdj software?

BTW, I'm not attacking you in so much as just exploring you're strange point of view.


you're not attacking him so much as just being ridiculously pedantic~


music made in logic is "software" because the sounds are synthesized by a piece of software.
music made in a gameboy is "hardware" because the sounds are synthesized/generated by hardware.

there is a real difference there -- death to fakebit!

right, but what if you're using lsdj with an emulator?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Battle+Lava 2011-02-09T16:40:21Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55107/#p55107 <![CDATA[Re: New to the Forum]]> Heosphoros wrote:

PyEss, I love you

Brilliant

]]> https://chipmusic.org/pyEss 2011-02-09T16:29:33Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/55103/#p55103