<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> 2012-04-05T17:47:06Z PunBB https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/6456/lets-procon-nanoloop-16/ <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> Lfo is triangle wave

]]> https://chipmusic.org/e.s.c. 2012-04-05T17:47:06Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98703/#p98703 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> nordloef wrote:
SKGB wrote:

being an artist is a lost art. though i totally agree

yo just a random question, i'm sorry to distract this thread but what kind of waveforms can the lfo output?

I think someone else asked that in another thread and Oliver replied. Search.

I asked that, it's square only.  50% duty cycle I believe.

EDIT:  Fuuuuu, sorry that info is for the FM modulator.  Derp.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/egr 2012-04-05T17:35:03Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98695/#p98695 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> campbell wrote:

the price is nice!

Yep. No longer paying $80 - $90 for a Nanoloop cart.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/disassembler 2012-04-05T17:26:26Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98691/#p98691 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> SKGB wrote:
herr_prof wrote:

Ear training is a lost art.

being an artist is a lost art. though i totally agree

yo just a random question, i'm sorry to distract this thread but what kind of waveforms can the lfo output?

I think someone else asked that in another thread and Oliver replied. Search.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/nordloef 2012-03-22T16:07:05Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95772/#p95772 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> tri only, if i'm not mistaken

]]> https://chipmusic.org/shizcake 2012-03-22T13:57:05Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95759/#p95759 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> herr_prof wrote:

Ear training is a lost art.

being an artist is a lost art. though i totally agree

yo just a random question, i'm sorry to distract this thread but what kind of waveforms can the lfo output?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/SKGB 2012-03-22T13:26:17Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95751/#p95751 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> Reteris wrote:

1.5

Who invited you?

]]> https://chipmusic.org/A+Versus+B 2012-03-22T12:55:20Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95749/#p95749 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> campbell wrote:

when i'm transcribing something i don't want to have to count pixels. i want actual note names.

One of the things I like most on nanoloops is that I don't have to think melodies.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/PULSELOOPER 2012-03-22T12:36:33Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95744/#p95744 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> 1.5

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Reteris 2012-03-22T01:48:57Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95652/#p95652 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> con: didnt realize it was registered mail, now have to wait a few extra days to get it since i'm at work when the post office is open

]]> https://chipmusic.org/e.s.c. 2012-03-22T01:10:16Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95647/#p95647 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> The price is low because of the amount of cons...

]]> https://chipmusic.org/A+Versus+B 2012-03-22T00:02:06Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95636/#p95636 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> campbell wrote:

when i'm transcribing something i don't want to have to count pixels. i want actual note names.

I could always see what note it was just by looking at the location of the block. So I had no problems transcribing stuff. But yes its maybe easier for some people with actual note names. For me it doesnt really matter, both are good. smile

]]> https://chipmusic.org/nordloef 2012-03-21T23:46:41Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95632/#p95632 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> Loads fast
Note letters
Short Gated notes(for awesome noize)
-----------------------------------
No Wave Retrigger
L/R kicks don't sound as good as 1.3
No delay
Extra rom space -_-
(not needed since I bought the cart
for NL not another rom)

]]> https://chipmusic.org/Rock+Kandy 2012-03-21T22:34:11Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95620/#p95620 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> when i'm transcribing something i don't want to have to count pixels. i want actual note names.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/campbell 2012-03-21T21:16:01Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95609/#p95609 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> Ear training is a lost art.

]]> https://chipmusic.org/herr_prof 2012-03-21T20:23:22Z https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95599/#p95599