<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://chipmusic.org:80/forums/feed/atom/topic/7566/"/>
	<updated>2012-06-25T00:09:32Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/7566/how-an-original-chiptune-release-gets-received-by-pitchfork/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115300/#p115300"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Stevens wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m not convinced by the argument that the audience for chipmusic consists solely of slightly nerdy console limitation-pushers and nostalgic keyjazzers though.</p></blockquote></div><p>Of course not. I mean, just look at the number of clueless-to-the-process people who come out to the shows and enjoy them? Only problem is... then they get transformed into slightly nerdy console limitation-pushers and nostalgic keyjazzers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[SketchMan3]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/SketchMan3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-25T00:09:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115300/#p115300</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115296/#p115296"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Note that Adventure, like every squarewave-bashing artist to touch hipster media, didn&#039;t associate himself with the &#039;chipmusic scene&#039; (indeed, the comparisons the journalist makes are to Crystal Castles and Dan Deacon/Wham City, not Nullsleep and Goto80). The chipmusic scene we know and love is an impenetrable outsider ghetto totally separate from the alternative mainstream.</p><p>I&#039;m not convinced by the argument that the audience for chipmusic consists solely of slightly nerdy console limitation-pushers and nostalgic keyjazzers though. Does anybody remember Bjork bigging up Bodenstandig 2000? gwEm releasing on Shitkatapult? Quarta330 becoming a Hyperdub staple with his 100% LSDJ tracks?</p><p>Think like a Pitchfork artist and you will appear on Pitchfork. It doesn&#039;t matter if you make jazz (The Bad Plus), experimental noise (Hecker), or chipmusic (Adventure).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Stevens]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Stevens</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T23:52:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115296/#p115296</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115271/#p115271"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Heosphoros wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>shitbird wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s not peoples fault for not knowing how something is made, or fully understanding music at all.. I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant.....also fuck journalists and being interviewed imo. It&#039;s usually just someones job, and not a passion. The most accurate review I&#039;ve ever gotten was on someones tumbler; NOT the local&nbsp; newspaper.</p></blockquote></div><p>you seem mad.</p></blockquote></div><p>^started as an opinion, and turned into a rant, lol</p><p>or debate....ffffuuuuu&nbsp; im leaving internet</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[shitbird]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/shitbird</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T22:28:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115271/#p115271</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115264/#p115264"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>every single pitchfork review is unreadable tripe, why would their reviews of chip stuff be any different <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />))))))))</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[ant1]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/ant1</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T22:11:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115264/#p115264</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115260/#p115260"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>shitbird wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s not peoples fault for not knowing how something is made, or fully understanding music at all.. I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant.....also fuck journalists and being interviewed imo. It&#039;s usually just someones job, and not a passion. The most accurate review I&#039;ve ever gotten was on someones tumbler; NOT the local&nbsp; newspaper.</p></blockquote></div><p>you seem mad.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Heosphoros]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Heosphoros</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T22:08:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115260/#p115260</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115255/#p115255"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant...</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, because they&#039;re not distracted by all the internal analysis and criticism and dissecting that goes on in the mind of the musically-inclined.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[SketchMan3]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/SketchMan3</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T21:58:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115255/#p115255</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115248/#p115248"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not peoples fault for not knowing how something is made, or fully understanding music at all.. I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant.....also fuck journalists and being interviewed imo. It&#039;s usually just someones job, and not a passion. The most accurate review I&#039;ve ever gotten was on someones tumbler; NOT the local&nbsp; newspaper.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[shitbird]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/shitbird</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T21:45:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115248/#p115248</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115245/#p115245"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Heosphoros wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>To the mass media/populace, chipmusic is a novelty. For them it&#039;s the mathematical:</p><p>song I know from radio play + nostalgic bleeps and bloops = lol funny</p><p>A one listen through for jokes, a share on facebook and then a quick decay inside their minds. We shouldn&#039;t be marketing to those people at all. The fans we already have do listen to us and they do it for all the right reasons.</p></blockquote></div><p>wisdom</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Aeros]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Aeros</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T21:15:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115245/#p115245</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115244/#p115244"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>To the mass media/populace, chipmusic is a novelty. For them it&#039;s the mathematical:</p><p>song I know from radio play + nostalgic bleeps and bloops = lol funny</p><p>A one listen through for jokes, a share on facebook and then a quick decay inside their minds. We shouldn&#039;t be marketing to those people at all. The fans we already have do listen to us and they do it for all the right reasons.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Heosphoros]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Heosphoros</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T21:05:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115244/#p115244</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115241/#p115241"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p><p>I found this a bit interesting since most bigger websites only write about chiptune cover releases.</p><p><a href="http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/12477-adventure/" target="_blank">http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/12477-adventure/</a></p><p>I know it&#039;s a bit old but still.</p><p>/ nordloef</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[nordloef]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/nordloef</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-06-24T20:55:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115241/#p115241</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
