<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://chipmusic.org:80/forums/feed/atom/topic/8843/"/>
	<updated>2012-10-22T18:40:58Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/8843/what-changes-are-in-the-nanoloop-26-update/</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138525/#p138525"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dasid wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>hmmm my 2.3 cart has been more reliable then my 2.5 cart. did he switch back and forth between 2.3 and 2.6? is 2.5 different?</p></blockquote></div><div class="quotebox"><cite>Oliver Wittchow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Since the new batch of 2.x is based on the 2.2 / 2.3 PCB/Chip combo again, it is possible to get a 2.6 cart with 2.2 on it.</p></blockquote></div><p>Well, looks like the new carts are in fact based on the 2.3 hardware! Cool!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Telerophon]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Telerophon</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T18:40:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138525/#p138525</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138521/#p138521"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>From an email Oliver sent me a couple weeks ago...worth posting simply for the sake of cataloging data on earlier 2.x releases:</p><p>Hi Anthony</p><br /><br /><p>- What are the differences between 2.5.1 and 2.5.4?&nbsp; I&#039;ve noticed 2.5.1 mutes in certain cases when normal/filter/fm note value is placed in the far left column, and will extend 1 column past the boundary box on the right.&nbsp; Was this intentional?&nbsp; In any case, I&#039;ve encountered it before, and I love it, as assigning an LFO that hits that &quot;mute&quot; column rapidly allows for some really interesting sounds.</p><p>Mainly bugfixes concerning song playback. The pause/resume/stepwise function.</p><br /><br /><p>- What does C stand for vs. S?</p><p>Honestly I don&#039;t know why I re-labeled S to C. Should be S.</p><br /><br /><p>- Has ping pong been repaired in either of these versions?&nbsp; (haven&#039;t tested it yet myself)</p><p>Not yet.</p><br /><br /><p>- Do you recall what the differences are between versions 2.0 and 2.0.1?&nbsp; I haven&#039;t seen one of either in action, sadly.&nbsp; I&#039;m curious if they function like 2.1, 2.2, or 2.3 and after.</p><p>2.0 is much the same as 2.1, it just lacks the limiter so that loudness is much lower. 2.01 was a minor update, I don&#039;t remember what it did.</p><p>Since the new batch of 2.x is based on the 2.2 / 2.3 PCB/Chip combo again, it is possible to get a 2.6 cart with 2.2 on it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[nonfinite]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/nonfinite</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T18:31:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138521/#p138521</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138475/#p138475"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>ahh thanks, thats where it was hiding. ok good ping pong fixed.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dasid]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/dasid</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T10:01:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138475/#p138475</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138463/#p138463"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I looked and found a kind of truncated release note in the <a href="http://nanoloop.de/advance/specs.html" target="_blank">nanoloop 2 specs</a> on the site:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Oliver Wittchow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p><span class="bbu">New in Verison 2.6.0</span> </p><p>- Ping-pong mode is back. </p><p><span class="bbu">New in Verison 2.5.5</span> </p><p>- Bug in manual playback fixed. </p><p><span class="bbu">New in Verison 2.5.4 </span></p><p>- Scrambled icons in arpeggio mode corrected<br />- Pause &amp; resume playback with A / B at tempo control<br />- When paused, manual, stepwise playback with A is possible. <br />- Setting delay from within menu affects only even steps, so that a swing factor can be applied easily.</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Telerophon]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Telerophon</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T05:39:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138463/#p138463</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138457/#p138457"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>i know of a few fixes ill be looking and hoping for. i will update one of my carts tonight and test.</p><p>hmmm my 2.3 cart has been more reliable then my 2.5 cart. did he switch back and forth between 2.3 and 2.6? is 2.5 different?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dasid]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/dasid</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T04:52:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138457/#p138457</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138449/#p138449"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve got a cart in the mail, but I didn&#039;t really get to play with the previous version much, so I might not be much help answering this question.</p><p>I&#039;m under the impression that it&#039;s mostly a bugfix release. Here&#039;s a quote I have from the man himself:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Oliver Wittchow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The 2.6 cart contains the same circuit and chip as the original 2.3 cart, which has proven to be reliable over many years.</p><p>Software-wise, 2.6 is only a minor update to 2.5.</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Telerophon]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/Telerophon</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T03:30:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138449/#p138449</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[what changes are in the Nanoloop 2.6 update?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138438/#p138438"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>anyone brave the NL 2.6 update yet? I can&#039;t find any info on what has been changed/fixed.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dasid]]></name>
				<uri>https://chipmusic.org/dasid</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-10-22T01:02:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/138438/#p138438</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
