<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Help with essay on tech affecting composing speeds?]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/10163/help-with-essay-on-tech-affecting-composing-speeds/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Help with essay on tech affecting composing speeds?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with essay on tech affecting composing speeds?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155769/#p155769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>threesecondsecret says:</i></b><p>Awesome <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> Thank you very much. I hadn&#039;t really thought about what you write on a computer and how you&#039;d write it on an instrument differing.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155769/#p155769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with essay on tech affecting composing speeds?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155737/#p155737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>chunter says:</i></b><p>Adding to this, prior to learning sequencers if I composed I wrote to paper just as quickly as I punch in a tracker now, meaning that the handwritten music is more deliberate, less &quot;jammed.&quot;</p><p>When I wrote to manuscript I could write faster than I could punch notes into notation software.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155737/#p155737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help with essay on tech affecting composing speeds?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155712/#p155712</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>sugar sk*-*lls says:</i></b><p>from my experience using that kind of technology has greatly increased my usage of aleatory or accidental elements in composition via a destructive/random cut and paste techniques. i can use the tech to quickly come up with musical sequences i would never think of otherwise.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155712/#p155712</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Help with essay on tech affecting composing speeds?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155686/#p155686</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>threesecondsecret says:</i></b><p>Hi guys,</p><p>I’ve got some uni essays to write, can I pick your brains as some of my research? <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><p>One of them is on the speed of composing changing with the introduction and advancements in technology.</p><p>Does anyone have any thoughts/experience with this? I’m kind of thinking in terms of composing on early computers/DAWs compared to like a MacPro running ProTools, or things like using hardware synths compared to VSTs.<br />Also does anyone compose without any tech, like scoring for orchestra and then do the same genre in software, and how does that differ in speed?</p><p>Finally, does anyone run something like Cubase 1-3 on an Atari as well as a modern DAW (ideally Cubase 6) that could possibly do a few tests on speed to enter MIDI data etc.</p><br /><p>Cheers! <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /><br />Jack</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/155686/#p155686</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
