<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/10811/which-dmg-cpu-do-you-prefer-for-using-lsdj/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 21:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164478/#p164478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>thebitman says:</i></b><p>CPU revisions do affect the sound quite a bit, I noticed that the Super Gameboy CPU handles the L command differently from the DMG CPU. Certain DMG&#039;s of mine will stutter and skip on tables in the noise channel. Some of them handle samples better than others. With a bit of investigation I bet I could figure out why. Recently I have been writing on a Gameboy Pocket since it behaves consistently and when cranked through a EQ-ing mixer I can make bass sound pretty close to the DMG&#039;s.</p><p>Use what works and sounds good to you. Most people won&#039;t notice or care. I am fine with anything as long as it sounds good in my setup and won&#039;t interrupt my workflow when I hop between consoles.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 21:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164478/#p164478</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164474/#p164474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Timbob says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Glitch Militia wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>katsumbhong wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The SGB is a tad bit faster because of the timing crystal... but you&#039;re only switching over the SGB CPU and not the SGB timing crystal.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hmm, would switching over the crystal aswell, make the gameboy detune?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yep. It would all sound detuned. <br />It would work, if you use a crystal twice as fast. <br />Then everything would be one octave higher.</p><p>A SGB crystal would make it just slightly faster without much benefit, and you&#039;d have to patch the whole lsdj rom to get it all in tune.<br />Lots of work for not a lot of extra speed.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164474/#p164474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164388/#p164388</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Glitch Militia says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>katsumbhong wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The SGB is a tad bit faster because of the timing crystal... but you&#039;re only switching over the SGB CPU and not the SGB timing crystal.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hmm, would switching over the crystal aswell, make the gameboy detune?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164388/#p164388</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164387/#p164387</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Timbob says:</i></b><p>Theoratically if you over clock your DMG at double speed, and play everything at half the bpm and one Octave lower, you would have better table handling.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164387/#p164387</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164386/#p164386</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>The Laohu says:</i></b><p>I have one cpu-03 that the wav channel (especially samples) sounds absolutely atrocious on. It also does not play nice with ASM PCB mount pro sound.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164386/#p164386</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164377/#p164377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>katsumbhong says:</i></b><p>The SGB is a tad bit faster because of the timing crystal... but you&#039;re only switching over the SGB CPU and not the SGB timing crystal.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164377/#p164377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164373/#p164373</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Timbob says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Glitch Militia wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>kitsch wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>the DMG CPU revisions won&#039;t affect the ability to run tables.</p></blockquote></div><p>But replacing it with a SGB CPU would.</p></blockquote></div><p>Nope, it won&#039;t. It will just start faster, that&#039;s all.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164373/#p164373</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164371/#p164371</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>BlakePalmer says:</i></b><p>.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164371/#p164371</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164369/#p164369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Alley Beach says:</i></b><p>cpu-02 has an issue about sampling i think</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164369/#p164369</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164367/#p164367</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Victory Road says:</i></b><p>i dunno, i&#039;ve read numerous posts by the cleverest dudes saying that the SGB cpu isn&#039;t faster, it just boots quicker (i.e. no nintendo logo and &quot;bading!&quot;)<br />or at least, that was my understanding of things!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164367/#p164367</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164351/#p164351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Glitch Militia says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>kitsch wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>the DMG CPU revisions won&#039;t affect the ability to run tables.</p></blockquote></div><p>But replacing it with a SGB CPU would.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164351/#p164351</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164350/#p164350</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>basspuddle says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>BlakePalmer wrote:</cite><blockquote><p><a class="postimg" href="http://i.imgur.com/HyeiCTN.png" title="http://i.imgur.com/HyeiCTN.png" id="forum_image_13646797"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/HyeiCTN.png" /></a></p></blockquote></div><p>LITTLE SOUND DISC LION</p><p>edit for jungle cats</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164350/#p164350</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164348/#p164348</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>BlakePalmer says:</i></b><p>.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164348/#p164348</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164342/#p164342</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>kitsch says:</i></b><p>the DMG CPU revisions won&#039;t affect the ability to run tables.&nbsp; </p><p>the revisions do affect the wav channel however.&nbsp; not sure the particularities of this, other than this is where the differences are key to some people.&nbsp; most avoid a -B CPU with a DMG-CPU-02 PCB layout.&nbsp; i think thats the &#039;iffy&#039; combo.</p><p>could be entirely wrong though!&nbsp; imo, its all part of the equipment itself, the consoles which really fuck up the sound in some unexpected way are more of a gem to me even if its just sitting down trying to &#039;tame&#039; them</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 03:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164342/#p164342</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Which DMG cpu do you prefer for using LSDJ?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164336/#p164336</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>herr_prof says:</i></b><p>there are none for dmgs. If you are concerned about tables, use a gameboy advance or sp.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/164336/#p164336</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
