This looks too good to be true. But it certainly looks a whole lot easier than my current plan of urning and manufacturing the CDs myself, and shipping them off myself.
I might trial this for my first album/EP CD release!

However, the product pages are quite confusing. I can't seea purchase button anywhere :\

you could make money by making your own cds and slanging them to us.
your basically un supporting yourself for somebodys proffit.
I am sure we can look past the pure shit cover art to appreciate the music you gave to us.
or you can share it with us digitally because we don't own cd burnerz

I was just about to say the same. A glass master cost a few buckzzzzz..

I'd say it's most likely CD-Rs.

The quantities they produce are no where near enough to warrant cutting a die for.

I had one of my old old EPs made with Kunaki and it is a CD-R (green bottom). This was 2008 so maybe it's changed since then, but.

I'm using Trepstar.com for my cds.  I tried them a few years ago and the quality wasn't that great.  I was tired of all the problems i've had with kunaki so I switched back.  And to my surprise, the quality is now much better.  Am I just thinking it's better?  Anyone else use trepstar.com?

I didnt know this existed. I am forever in your debt .

Um I looked into Kunaki and they have a legit CD manufacturing facility so these are NOT CD-Rs.

How's the playback and actual quality of the disc? I imagine this uses CD-Rs and not real CDs.

Coming in here to evangelize for Kunaki, I was already taken in by the low pricing and wasn't even aware of how simple the whole process is. Had low expectations for the album art, but it came out just as good as Reverbnation which was charging me upwards of $5.30/disc with shipping. Kunaki is it for me from now on!

i knew that but didn't know about the shit quality.

yeah the marbled vinyl is cheap cause its the scraps from making other people's records

man i never knew the quality dropped with marbled vinyl.

this is why im skipping on using marbled vinyl, its just a rough trade off to save 15% or so on the pressing and have a reduction in quality, when the high quality is a key benefit to vinyl over other formats to begin with

i'd rather pay a little more for quality than get cheap vinyl.
the last thing i want are my records being played out after only a few plays.
on top of that.. low-end is typically lost on cheap vinyl... i refuse to sacrifice quality just cuz it costs less. even if i have to sit on 100 of the 300 i pressed.