<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/19821/out-now-nanoloop-longform-minimalism-compilation/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254817/#p254817</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>janza_slope says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>pselodux wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Thanks everyone! This ended up being even better than I expected. I&#039;ll put the word out for a new comp early next year; I&#039;m thinking hybrid (ie. nanoloop + other devices). I also had an idea for something more along the lines of minimalist composition / &quot;nanoloop ensemble&quot; though so maybe we can give that a go <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>janza_slope wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Ah! Great to read. I had wondered if there might be info on versions of NL folk had used for individual tracks.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, a few people included text files detailing the version of nanoloop used, but I decided against including it with the release because most of the submissions didn&#039;t include this information (my fault; I should have asked for this in the submission form).</p></blockquote></div><p>It&#039;s probs a good thing, great to know what can be achieved but I guess it&#039;s nice to preserve the mystery!<br />Insomnia has its advantages - been re-listening over the last few nights, great compilation, great work all round.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254817/#p254817</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254816/#p254816</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pselodux says:</i></b><p>Thanks everyone! This ended up being even better than I expected. I&#039;ll put the word out for a new comp early next year; I&#039;m thinking hybrid (ie. nanoloop + other devices). I also had an idea for something more along the lines of minimalist composition / &quot;nanoloop ensemble&quot; though so maybe we can give that a go <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>janza_slope wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Ah! Great to read. I had wondered if there might be info on versions of NL folk had used for individual tracks.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, a few people included text files detailing the version of nanoloop used, but I decided against including it with the release because most of the submissions didn&#039;t include this information (my fault; I should have asked for this in the submission form).</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254816/#p254816</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254812/#p254812</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ScanianWolf says:</i></b><p>I can only say... WOW! What an astonishing work! </p><p>Huge respect to pselodux for this great initiative and putting it all together! <br />I&#039;ve already listened through it once and I can&#039;t wait to have some more time to get absorbed by these amazing tracks on some good speakers! <br />Christmas vacation is gonna be great for that!</p><p>Once again, thanks to everyone that participated to make this release and I&#039;m proud to be a part of this compilation with all of you talented musicians!<br />Have a great Sunday!</p><p>/Scanian Wolf</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2017 13:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254812/#p254812</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254810/#p254810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>janza_slope says:</i></b><p>Just realised there are references to versions used in earlier posts.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254810/#p254810</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254809/#p254809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>janza_slope says:</i></b><p>Ah! Great to read. I had wondered if there might be info on versions of NL folk had used for individual tracks.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254809/#p254809</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254807/#p254807</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>e.s.c. says:</i></b><p>my track is nanoloop 1.3 + 2x nanoloop 2.3</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 23:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254807/#p254807</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254804/#p254804</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Analylogiq says:</i></b><p>Niiice <br />6 hours.....<br />I just listened a few parts as a tease and cannot wait to listen it on a row with my phones</p><p>nice work everyone cheerz</p><p>specially track 15 you have to put it on repeat so xellent</p><p>bravo bravo</p><p>I&#039;m still trying to guess witch versions of NL are used<br />I recognized NL One<br />I hope some artists there are using NL 2 cuz there are some nice sounds I&#039;ve never imagined in nl one (I&#039;ll have to test NL two some day)&nbsp; <br />maybe some nl mono </p><p>okay let&#039;s go back for better listening</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254804/#p254804</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254796/#p254796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>dualitymicro says:</i></b><p>I really love this release - perfect</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254796/#p254796</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254795/#p254795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>darenager says:</i></b><p>I had a very brief skim listen to this today, some very nice tracks on it, I look forward to having a proper listen when time permits, but in the meantime congratulations to all involved, great stuff <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/heart.gif" width="15" height="15" alt="heart" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 20:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254795/#p254795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254791/#p254791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>janza_slope says:</i></b><p>Man, this album is dope. </p><p>Been gradually feeling my way around Nanoloop Mono over the last couple of weeks, trying to coax out odd sounds. <br />I was wondering if folks were using NL to make experimental work and then (as if by magic) a whole album is delivered. <br />I see it&#039;s been brewing for a while, looks like I picked the perfect time to check in.</p><p>Super inspiring.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 16:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254791/#p254791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254786/#p254786</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pselodux says:</i></b><p>I decided to just do a quick master, as suggested.. so it&#039;s done! Check the first post in the thread for details!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254786/#p254786</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254711/#p254711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>e.s.c. says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>djhaka wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;ll throw out a name suggestion:</p><p>Since these are all Nanoloop songs, but definitely not &quot;nano&quot; in length, how about &quot;MILLILOOP&quot;? Or <a href="https://www.nist.gov/pml/weights-and-measures/prefixes" target="_blank">some other unit prefix</a> <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p></blockquote></div><p>but &quot;milli&quot; means one-one-thousandth. if anything, this would be &quot;kiloloop&quot; or &quot;megaloop&quot;, but neither sounds good really</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254711/#p254711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254710/#p254710</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>e.s.c. says:</i></b><p>i could try putting together some ideas for artwork (without any of the text since that&#039;s TBD still). no worries on the mastering taking a while, that&#039;s no surprise when there&#039;s so much audio. probably fair if you just do mild compression and normalizing since the odds of really getting levels to be similar all the way through are pretty low</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254710/#p254710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254709/#p254709</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>djhaka says:</i></b><p>I&#039;ll throw out a name suggestion:</p><p>Since these are all Nanoloop songs, but definitely not &quot;nano&quot; in length, how about &quot;MILLILOOP&quot;? Or <a href="https://www.nist.gov/pml/weights-and-measures/prefixes" target="_blank">some other unit prefix</a> <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254709/#p254709</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OUT NOW!! nanoloop long-form minimalism compilation]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254705/#p254705</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pselodux says:</i></b><p>Yeah, sorry everyone, it&#039;s taken me much longer than expected. Life getting in the way etc.</p><p>I have a pretty solid track list so it&#039;s just a matter of mastering it, which, for a compilation of almost 6 hours, is pretty daunting!</p><p>In the meantime, if anyone has any compilation name or artwork suggestions, post them in this thread; for the first time ever I&#039;m struggling to think of something!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/254705/#p254705</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
