<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/1999/is-renoise-worth-it/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Is Renoise worth it?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39892/#p39892</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>null1024 says:</i></b><p>Renoise is worth it if you intend to make something other than chip with it as well.<br />It&#039;s extremely powerful, very similar to MilkyTracker [both take their UI-design from FastTracker II, so there shouldn&#039;t be too many problems], and works rather well, even on crap machines.<br />I had Renoise 1.9 on a 500MHz iBook, 192MB of RAM. I made a fairly complicated track, and used only about 30% CPU [uses ~3% CPU on my current 2.1GHz PC].</p><p>Also, the sampler in Renoise. Maaaan, the sampler. BEST. THING. EVER. Applying DSPs straight to samples, precise loop editor, and being generally easy to use... great stuff.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39892/#p39892</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39114/#p39114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>STereochan says:</i></b><p>For me, Renoise is to lsdj what hookers are to blow: You can do well with just one of the two, but both at the same time yield the best results.<br />For &quot;just chiptune&quot;, I prefer a gameboy and nothing more, but using renoise adds such a huge dimension of possibilities... <br />Though I haven&#039;t bought it yet. ... ... ...SHUT UP I DON&#039;T HAVE THE MONEY! HOOKERS AND BLOW ARE EXPENSIVE!!!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39114/#p39114</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39112/#p39112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>rumpelfilter says:</i></b><p>I agree that you don&#039;t need something like Renoise to do chiptunes the purist way. I would even go as far as to say that using Renoise makes your chiptunes less &quot;chituneish&quot;. On the other hand, it really depends on the individual approach, some of you will certainly disagree, but to me, making chiptunes does not exclude the use of advanced DSP and it does not even exclude vst... so I think you can use Renoise to make chipmusic... <br />In the end it all boils down to how you define chiptunes, but personally I don&#039;t care a lot about definitions, as Duke Ellington once said, there&#039;s two types of music: the good one and the rest.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39112/#p39112</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39109/#p39109</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>KMuland says:</i></b><p>Im disagree with the opinions here. YOU DONT NEED RENOISE FOR MAKE CHIPMUSIC!!!</p><p>I would bet for simple trackers. Renoise have tons of pro features that you will never use.</p><p>Ok, people will reply me saying: &quot;but with renoise you can make chiptunes too&quot;<br />Yes.. agree... but again.. you will be use only the very basic features that you can get in other trackers for free.. ( so not need to pay)</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39109/#p39109</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38355/#p38355</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>rumpelfilter wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>ant1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Renoise is really worth it<br />but not for making chiptunes</p></blockquote></div><p>how is that?</p></blockquote></div><p>the most noteworthy features are the built in DSPs and VST support - not things that you need to do chiptunes<br />you can get everything you need to do chiptunes from a free tracker and I don&#039;t think you&#039;d miss much by using milky/schism/protracker if you were just bleeping and blooping (and these trackers are much lighter, and seem to have a sleeker interface too).</p><p>for non-chippy (real?) music, renoise is absolutely fantastic! recommended +++++++</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38355/#p38355</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38343/#p38343</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>rumpelfilter says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>ant1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Renoise is really worth it<br />but not for making chiptunes</p></blockquote></div><p>how is that?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38343/#p38343</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38329/#p38329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><p>Renoise is really worth it</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>but not for making chiptunes</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38329/#p38329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38316/#p38316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>tacticalbread says:</i></b><p>You must have a slow CPU then lol, cause it run perfectly fine on my craptop.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38316/#p38316</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38312/#p38312</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Apricorn says:</i></b><p>I tried renoise and it takes up quite alot of my cpu when playing songs back and screws up. Try MadTracker2. Its free, uses vst and samples, interface is sorta like milkytracker, and It doesn&#039;t lag.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38312/#p38312</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38303/#p38303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>freezedream says:</i></b><p>Man, I&#039;m checking out Renoise now.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38303/#p38303</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32672/#p32672</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>rumpelfilter says:</i></b><p>i&#039;d say it&#039;s also worth for having a very powerful and flexible sampler built right into the DAW. Well actually that is the core of the DAW in Renoise <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32672/#p32672</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32666/#p32666</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>GaMEcat says:</i></b><p>worth it for &#039;capture VST as samples&#039; alone (which is disabled in the demo, and the main reason I bought it!)&nbsp; &nbsp;<img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32666/#p32666</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32626/#p32626</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pixls says:</i></b><p>I just downloaded the demo version, when i have the cash, i may need to pay for it for real</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32626/#p32626</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32601/#p32601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Beware says:</i></b><p>@Ant1:&nbsp; There is a nearly full featured Demo version.&nbsp; You only pay for a small handful of features that don&#039;t really affect the overall usability of it.&nbsp; You pay if you want to pay.</p><p>Yes, it&#039;s a team of people making money from the software, but it is built with a LOT of input from the community.&nbsp; The devs are very open to suggestion and will add just about anything if demand for it is great enough (and sometimes just for kicks).&nbsp; Renoise wasn&#039;t made by some high profile business execs either, it was a small project at first.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32601/#p32601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Is Renoise worth it?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32517/#p32517</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Analog says:</i></b><p>I never meant that the program wasn&#039;t amazing and worth it. I have a friend who tried all programs avaliable and end up using seq24 <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/tongue.png" width="15" height="15" alt="tongue" /> . And he makes awesome stuff with it.</p><p>I&#039;m not saying you don&#039;t have to buy it. I&#039;m just saying that you can try another pieces of software, maybe (if your bugdet is low) ANOTHER option may suit for your particular needs. For example, i just use the modern computer for recording+FX&#039;s. No need to buy anything (on linux there are ardour and LADSPA fx&#039;s - among a lot, just naming some). Even better, you can donate to make ardour more awesome.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/32517/#p32517</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
