<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/2295/kick-bass-in-lsdj/ Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:31:58 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39286/#p39286 likeluke says:
Unicorn Dream Attack wrote:

i like this method better.

i was actually just messing around with something like this the other day! interested to see all this sweet-ass input, gotta try some of this out.

]]> Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:31:58 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/39286/#p39286 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38114/#p38114 Unicorn Dream Attack says:

]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:10:08 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38114/#p38114 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38026/#p38026 animalstyle says:
tRasH cAn maN wrote:
gijs wrote:

i like my method better.

I like my method better. tongue
Reason? Bass and kick waveforms can be chosen independently and you can also make use of the PU1 sweep setting.

I like Method Man better than Redman.


- i'm good.


- i'm not as gooder

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:27:04 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38026/#p38026 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38013/#p38013 tRasH cAn maN says:
gijs wrote:

damn.. mine has less pictures..

Ha! I win.
tongue

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:11:43 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38013/#p38013 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38012/#p38012 gijs says:
tRasH cAn maN wrote:


tongue

damn.. mine has less pictures..

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:10:18 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38012/#p38012 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38010/#p38010 tRasH cAn maN says:


tongue

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:44:29 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38010/#p38010 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38009/#p38009 µB says:
nitro2k01 wrote:

I like my method better

gijs wrote:

I like my method better

tRasH cAn maN wrote:

I like my method better

Ahhh I can't decide! Curse you, free market!

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:40:48 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38009/#p38009 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38008/#p38008 nitro2k01 says:
gijs wrote:
tRasH cAn maN wrote:

I like my method better. tongue
Reason? Bass and kick waveforms can be chosen independently and you can also make use of the PU1 sweep setting.

my method has pictures (-;

But mine has (drum roll) a source file that you can download and have a look at.

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:14:27 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38008/#p38008 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38007/#p38007 gijs says:
tRasH cAn maN wrote:
gijs wrote:

i like my method better.

I like my method better. tongue
Reason? Bass and kick waveforms can be chosen independently and you can also make use of the PU1 sweep setting.

my method has pictures (-;

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:03:31 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38007/#p38007 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38005/#p38005 tRasH cAn maN says:
gijs wrote:
nitro2k01 wrote:

gijs: I actually like my method better...

i like my method better.

I like my method better. tongue
Reason? Bass and kick waveforms can be chosen independently and you can also make use of the PU1 sweep setting.

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:04:43 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38005/#p38005 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38004/#p38004 gijs says:
nitro2k01 wrote:

gijs: I actually like my method better, since it makes use of the first step, and doesn't require it to be just a silent dummy note.

However, as a tech note, I think 3.7.4 still had the bug/feature where the volume envelope would always be retriggered when entering a note number, even when clearing the instrument, so for 3.7.4 I guess that method was needed.

i like my method better.

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:12:34 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38004/#p38004 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38000/#p38000 neilbaldwin says:

Nothing to add and I'm not showing off (well, perhaps a little) but I'm glad to hear demand for absolute notes in Tables because Pulsar has them. I'm actually surprised that LSDJ doesn't. The problem for me when I looked at putting them into Pulsar was how to represent them in the Table given that;

00-7F = positive offset
FF-80 = negative offset

What I did was limit the positive and negative offsets to;

00-5F = positive offset
FF-B0 = negative offset

which gives you a range of (hex) 60 notes in either direction which more than exceeds the range of notes available.

I then use 60 to AF to represent absolute pitch, 60 being note 00, 6C being note 0C and so on.

Feel free to suggest it to Johan if you like the implementation.

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:41:03 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/38000/#p38000 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/37985/#p37985 freezedream says:

sweet. going to try this out soon. smile thanks for the info, nitro2k01

]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:26:53 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/37985/#p37985 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/37961/#p37961 nitro2k01 says:

gijs: I actually like my method better, since it makes use of the first step, and doesn't require it to be just a silent dummy note.

However, as a tech note, I think 3.7.4 still had the bug/feature where the volume envelope would always be retriggered when entering a note number, even when clearing the instrument, so for 3.7.4 I guess that method was needed.

]]> Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:43:27 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/37961/#p37961 <![CDATA[Re: Kick + Bass in LSDJ]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/37931/#p37931 gijs says:

http://gieskes.nl/lsdj/?link=instrument … index.html

]]> Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:23:00 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/37931/#p37931