<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/2982/nanoloop-12-for-nanoloop-13-or-23/ Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:12:48 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49117/#p49117 *E says:
e.s.c. wrote:
*E wrote:

If you know someone who has a 1.3 cart, there's a way to upgrade your 1.2

Maybe someone on the site could do it for you if you ship it to them (or you could send it to Oliver)

untrue
you can upgrade a 2.2 to 2.3
1.2 uses sram powered by battery and saves 4 banks and uses 3 channels, 1.3 uses flash memory and saves 16 banks and has 4 channels

I stand corrected, thanks for the clarification

]]> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:12:48 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49117/#p49117 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49106/#p49106 low-gain says:

i'd love to get my 1.2 cart back... i miss that version. totally kick ass kicks. smile

]]> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:44:35 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49106/#p49106 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49103/#p49103 e.s.c. says:
*E wrote:

If you know someone who has a 1.3 cart, there's a way to upgrade your 1.2

Maybe someone on the site could do it for you if you ship it to them (or you could send it to Oliver)

untrue
you can upgrade a 2.2 to 2.3
1.2 uses sram powered by battery and saves 4 banks and uses 3 channels, 1.3 uses flash memory and saves 16 banks and has 4 channels

]]> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:28:11 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49103/#p49103 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49102/#p49102 *E says:

If you know someone who has a 1.3 cart, there's a way to upgrade your 1.2

Maybe someone on the site could do it for you if you ship it to them (or you could send it to Oliver)

]]> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:42:42 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49102/#p49102 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49051/#p49051 an0va says:

blargh asdf

]]> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:51:22 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49051/#p49051 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49044/#p49044 facundo says:

<-- not it hmm

]]> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:56:26 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/49044/#p49044 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48870/#p48870 nordloef says:

to who? yikes

]]> Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:20:26 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48870/#p48870 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48859/#p48859 an-cat-max says:

gone.

]]> Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:44:32 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48859/#p48859 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48642/#p48642 Esopus-dragon says:

Private Messaged.

]]> Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:24:08 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48642/#p48642 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48308/#p48308 facundo says:

you can just mail me the cart for christmas

]]> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:25:19 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48308/#p48308 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48247/#p48247 an-cat-max says:
kitsch wrote:

PM'd

pm'd back :3

]]> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:15:37 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48247/#p48247 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48246/#p48246 an-cat-max says:
SAMWAVE wrote:

How much for either 1.2 or 1.3?

i'm looking for a 1.3 not selling one and i'd rather trade if possible.

]]> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:13:33 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48246/#p48246 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48245/#p48245 kitsch says:

PM'd

]]> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:01:27 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48245/#p48245 <![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48244/#p48244 SAMWAVE says:

How much for either 1.2 or 1.3?

]]> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:56:06 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48244/#p48244 <![CDATA[nanoloop 1.2 for nanoloop 1.3 or 2.3]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48243/#p48243 an-cat-max says:

gone.

]]> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 22:52:08 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/48243/#p48243