<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/453/amiga-commodore/ Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:17:17 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/11512/#p11512 lukass says:

We should be happy to be separate from Atari smile. Commodore people should stick together.

]]> Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:17:17 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/11512/#p11512 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/11453/#p11453 XyNo says:
CMDR wrote:

how about titling forums by their chip names.

more confusing...If we say SID and Paula...people will say "It's supposed to be Sid and Nancy...right ?!" hahaha

]]> Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:36:59 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/11453/#p11453 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6833/#p6833 arlen says:

We should just go with "Demoscene Clunkers".

]]> Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:54:57 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6833/#p6833 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6782/#p6782 BitPop says:
Mono wrote:

People could easily say the original Amiga was developed by Amiga Corporation (which it was), until it was bought by Commodore.

And subsequently by Escom and Gateway. So there are some Amigas out there which are not Commodores. tongue

Like this Escom A1200

]]> Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:03:34 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6782/#p6782 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6623/#p6623 CMDR says:

how about titling forums by their chip names.
after all, we make chipmusic, not console/computer name music don't we?

But then again, AY forums will be confusing sad

]]> Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:02:48 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6623/#p6623 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6383/#p6383 Trash80 says:

FIXED

]]> Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:30:22 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6383/#p6383 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6381/#p6381 Mono says:

Well, if you wanna get even more anus, Anders:

People could easily say the original Amiga was developed by Amiga Corporation (which it was), until it was bought by Commodore.

So looking at it from that perspective, one can easily say "Amiga & Commodore" works. ;D

Also, you would think "Commodore Hardware" or "Commodore Computers" would work just fine. I don't see why people would know the difference between old Nintendo machines but yet not Commodore machines?

What, simply because Nintendo is still around? Doesn't make sense at all.

Are people suggesting people are mentally handicap when it comes to Commodore or something? You would think it'd be the other way around. xD ahah

Also: this thread should have been made in the "Bugs and Requests" section, if not moved there by now, if one wants to get even more "anus". :D

]]> Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:04:24 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6381/#p6381 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6332/#p6332 Awol says:
goto80 wrote:

Now this is a bit anus, but since the Amiga was made by Commodore, it doesn't really make sense to say "Amiga & Commodore".

This has been bugging me too.

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:44:59 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6332/#p6332 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6328/#p6328 Rainbowdragoneyes says:
goto80 wrote:

MORDOR SHE WROTE

oh baby that's good stuff

goto80 is so commodorable all the time

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:14:58 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6328/#p6328 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6323/#p6323 akira^8GB says:
goto80 wrote:

COMMODORE POR FAVOR

That even rhymes, too sweet, let's use it xD

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:14:17 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6323/#p6323 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6320/#p6320 low-gain says:

"Amigadore 64"

Done.

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:03:27 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6320/#p6320 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6316/#p6316 Ogrim says:

the great sea

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:49:09 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6316/#p6316 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6312/#p6312 Trash80 says:

Hahaha. You see the issue though... There needs to be a simple and elegant answer. So far I think akira^8GB is almost perfect. Hmm...

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:39:15 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6312/#p6312 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6310/#p6310 goto80 says:

yeah, i don't know how the uninitiated would interpret just COMMODORE. maybe try with....

COMMODORE 64/AMIGA
COMMODORE COMPUTERS
COMMODORE HARDCORE
MORE THAN COMMODORE
COMMODORE POR FAVOR
C64/AMIGA IN MORDOR
MORDOR SHE WROTE
C-64 AND THE FAMILY SHY
COMMANDO COMMODORE
ALLES COMMODORE

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:31:49 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6310/#p6310 <![CDATA[Re: Amiga = Commodore...?]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6305/#p6305 Trash80 says:
akira^8GB wrote:

Change the section to "Commodore Amiga, C64 etc." ? tongue

Might work.

C64 AND MORE

]]> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:16:41 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/6305/#p6305