<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/4857/foobar2000-vs-xmplay/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Foobar2000 vs XMplay.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:40:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75535/#p75535</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Subway Sonicbeat says:</i></b><p>Just don&#039;t associate foobar to the files. I guess I did that.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75535/#p75535</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75522/#p75522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Rouwe says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>ant1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>i think xmplay might be MORE ACCURATE on mod/xm/it/s3m and you know how important 100% total perfect not-a-single-bit-different-to-fasttracker-2 accuracy is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p></blockquote></div><p>I think it&#039;s more about just playing it correctly rather than 100% ACCURATE SOUND REPRODUCTION, ESPECIALLY ON THOSE LATE 90s TRANCE XMs. There isn&#039;t any noise or special quirks (sound wise) to emulate in XM/S3M/IT so it focuses more on executing commands properly. Again it&#039;s not a big deal, but you&#039;ll run into some songs that just don&#039;t sound right. If you want 100% ACCURATE EMULATION of Amiga MODs you can use UADE. <a href="http://zakalwe.fi/uade/" target="_blank">http://zakalwe.fi/uade/</a> You&#039;ll have to use something like XMMS or Audacious on Linux to use it though. Overall when I used XMPlay I really liked it and can&#039;t recommend it more.</p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>fb2k is considerably nicer for playing mp3 files, but!<br />fb2k changes the icons of all the music files on your computer to a strange picture of an alien and it&#039;s not that simple to change them back</p></blockquote></div><p>Also this would be incredibly annoying.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75522/#p75522</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75511/#p75511</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>El Huesudo II says:</i></b><p>I use Foobar2000 for everything, because I can use it for everything.</p><p>Unless I can actually use NSFPlay on the computer I&#039;m at, then I use NSFPlay for NSFs.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75511/#p75511</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75508/#p75508</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Heosphoros says:</i></b><p>I use Foobar for .SAP and XMplay for .XM, .MOD and .IT</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75508/#p75508</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75500/#p75500</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Dos says:</i></b><p>-</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75500/#p75500</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75485/#p75485</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Subway Sonicbeat says:</i></b><p>I use Foobar to listen to my genesis and snes OSTs.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75485/#p75485</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75482/#p75482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>4mat says:</i></b><p>XMPlay is THE most accurate module player on PC, switch the mod playback mode to PT1 and it handles most Amiga ones fine too.&nbsp; (for the rest add the oldsk00l winamp plug-in)&nbsp; &nbsp;If you want more amiga formats <a href="http://dhost.info/pieknyman/html/plugins.html" target="_blank">Delix and AHX</a> are here. (though you might want to keep a copy of Deliplayer around for more obscure ones)</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 11:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75482/#p75482</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75478/#p75478</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>lynit says:</i></b><p>Yeah, foobar2000 can&#039;t play any mod stuff by default, however there are components that allows you to play them. I like foobar because it&#039;s simple, resource friendly, and has a great minimalist interface <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75478/#p75478</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75475/#p75475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><p>xmplay is able to use winamp plugins as well as plugins made for xmplay. i think it&#039;s been much easier to find plugins because of this.</p><p>i prefer the default skin of fb2k to the default skin of xmplay.</p><p>fb2k is considerably nicer for playing mp3 files, but!<br />fb2k changes the icons of all the music files on your computer to a strange picture of an alien and it&#039;s not that simple to change them back</p><p>i think xmplay might be MORE ACCURATE on mod/xm/it/s3m and you know how important 100% total perfect not-a-single-bit-different-to-fasttracker-2 accuracy is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p><p>foobar2000 is an mp3 player that people use to play mods, xmplay is a modplayer that people use to play mp3s <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" />&nbsp; when i was using foobar2000 as my main music player i still used xmplay for everything chiptunes</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75475/#p75475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Foobar2000 vs XMplay]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75469/#p75469</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>Does anyone have strong feelings for or against either of these guys as all purpose MOD/XM, NSF, SID etc players? They both seems to be winamp influenced players with lots of plug ins, I wondered if one was clearly better than the other for any reason?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/75469/#p75469</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
