<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/5023/optimal-nanoloop-set-up-questions/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions].]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:45:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251954/#p251954</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pselodux says:</i></b><p>I really wish they&#039;d built link cable support into the power connector. There&#039;s certainly enough space for extra pins.</p><p>I&#039;m wondering, is there *any* chance that the processor is capable of outputting/receiving link port data and just isn&#039;t connected to anything? Like, a hack that can be done somehow? I don&#039;t know enough about processors and electronics (yet) to go poking around..</p><p>Otherwise maybe a future nanoloop2 cart could have an analog sync port on the cart itself? oliver pls <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251954/#p251954</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251950/#p251950</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>yoyz2k says:</i></b><p>yeah the ds lite has better sound.... really...<br />It&#039;s a pleasure to play with <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /><br />The original ds is good too</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251950/#p251950</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251949/#p251949</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>yoyz2k says:</i></b><p>I have allways use the gba sp, only few time the ds lite.<br />But IMHO nanoloop on gba sp sync well with other gba sp, you won&#039;t have drift between two 2.x on gba sp. And yes on some gba sp you have some hiss, and if you use the sync cable you will have more hiss.<br />So for me the sync cable is not usable....<br />If you sync gba sp manually, so you use the A+B on the bpm menu to stop them, then start at the same time, you will have good sync.<br />For me they stay in sync really well over time for the 2.x version.<br />it&#039;s the only way to have good sound and use your other gears to manual sync, and for me it works, not great but for a track it&#039;s really enough.<br />Elektron gears are good for this kind of manual sync with left, right arrow, you put your elektron on master sync, and all your gear slave to the elektron.</p><p>EDiT: it should be the same for the DS lite, you sync with A+B two ds lite with nanoloop 2.7.x, then you sync your elektron gears to this manually. Best sound I think, and good think over time, need to double test this, but it should be the best clear sound and synx over time.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251949/#p251949</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251948/#p251948</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>theskyis256k says:</i></b><p>So im reviving this very old thread because ive been using nanoloop recently and loving it so much i want to start using it as my core component in my setup....</p><p>I have both an SP 100 and a DS Lite. i lvoe the sound on the DS lite. i got a chance to use it at a show the other day and it was kicking hard as balls. </p><p>there is however an issue that i ran into that for me is a complete dealbreaker for using the DS unfortunately.</p><p>when running on DS lite... the tempo of nanoloop is not accurate. ive done some tests @ 120bpm and after around 60 bars the tempo was behind by a 1/16th note. which is extremely drastic and unacceptable...</p><p>I know that you can&#039;t sync the DS to anything but i was at least hoping i could manually beatmatch with my other gear but if there&#039;s gonna be some drift like this it&#039;s gonna be pratically impossible to use with other gear.</p><p>so for anyone who&#039;s planning on using DS with other gear, don&#039;t. or at least do some tests about tempo drifts before you do.</p><p>I really like the DS sound and screen and buttons but ..... it&#039;s just not usable.</p><p>Does anyone else notice this? maybe it&#039;s just my DS? i used to think that because DS is more advanced (pun not intended) it would be even more acurate... but my SP was solid over 200 bars.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251948/#p251948</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251947/#p251947</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>theskyis256k says:</i></b><p>So im reviving this very old thread because ive been using nanoloop recently and loving it so much i want to start using it as my core component in my setup....</p><p>I have both an SP 100 and a DS Lite. i lvoe the sound on the DS lite. i got a chance to use it at a show the other day and it was kicking hard as balls. </p><p>there is however an issue that i ran into that for me is a complete dealbreaker for using the DS unfortunately.</p><p>when running on DS lite... the tempo of nanoloop is not accurate. ive done some tests @ 120bpm and after around 60 bars the tempo was behind by a 1/16th note. which is extremely drastic and unacceptable...</p><p>I know that you can&#039;t sync the DS to anything but i was at least hoping i could manually beatmatch with my other gear but if there&#039;s gonna be some drift like this it&#039;s gonna be pratically impossible to use with other gear.</p><p>so for anyone who&#039;s planning on using DS with other gear, don&#039;t. or at least do some tests about tempo drifts before you do.</p><p>I really like the DS sound and screen and buttons but ..... it&#039;s just not usable.</p><p>Does anyone else notice this? maybe it&#039;s just my DS? i used to think that because DS is more advanced (pun not intended) it would be even more acurate... but my SP was solid over 200 bars.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/251947/#p251947</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/238488/#p238488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>CloudSpell says:</i></b><p>you can clean that hiss sound with a DAW (Cockos Reaper ReaFIR effect check it out)</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/238488/#p238488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77405/#p77405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>DJCactus says:</i></b><p>i have 2.3 and i usually run it out of a micro myself, though at first i did play on a ds lite when i got it but had to free up the ds for other things.</p><p>edit:&nbsp; and i havnt seen a huge sound quality difference between the two.&nbsp; At least not going threw my mixer</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77405/#p77405</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77392/#p77392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>an-cat-max says:</i></b><p>i use a 101 too and i luv it</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77392/#p77392</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77383/#p77383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pixls says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>oliver wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>e.s.c.: you can download the latest 2.5 ROM from <a href="http://www.nanoloop.com/usb" target="_blank">www.nanoloop.com/usb</a>. there is still a bug in the song mode though that causes patterns to be skipped / repeated when all rows are in 1/x tempo.</p></blockquote></div><p>Will it be made known when that&#039;s fixed? Would&#039;ve been good to know beforehand on this last song I was working on.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77383/#p77383</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77341/#p77341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>e.s.c. says:</i></b><p>gah, well thanks for letting me know about that song mode bug...i write way too much in 1/4 &amp; 1/8 to upgrade to 2.5 yet then (and yeah, i use song mode for when im recording or syncing to external gear), so ill just leave my carts in the gb micros like normal until that little bug is gone <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77341/#p77341</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77334/#p77334</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>oliver says:</i></b><p>e.s.c.: you can download the latest 2.5 ROM from <a href="http://www.nanoloop.com/usb" target="_blank">www.nanoloop.com/usb</a>. there is still a bug in the song mode though that causes patterns to be skipped / repeated when all rows are in 1/x tempo.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77334/#p77334</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77333/#p77333</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Spöka says:</i></b><p>I don&#039;t mind having only a couple of patterns to work with, actually. It enables me to make nice, repetitive Minimal Techno. Makes it easy to play live too. With LSDJ I always have too many patterns and I don&#039;t remember half of them which makes me fuck up when I play live... <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/big_smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="big_smile" /> </p><p>And the fact that you can switch between songs without delay or stopping the music won me over.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77333/#p77333</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77330/#p77330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>pixls says:</i></b><p>I&#039;ve found that a lot of the fun is making the program do things it&#039;s not supposed to.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77330/#p77330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77329/#p77329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>mk says:</i></b><p>Haha.. Sounds like me too.. Love the breadth of sounds I can make but sequencing feels so rigid</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77329/#p77329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions]]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77323/#p77323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>wedanced says:</i></b><p>i just do everything live. i am not a fan of the song editor.<br />I love the sound capability of 2.x but the interface leaves out a lot that i think would be useful. pitch bending over the C channel would be sweet. i also wish i had more steps with out having to slow down to 1/8 and the likes.<br />i have been having trouble writing the complicated patterns i want to even with the delay screen. also i wish you could adjust the sounds through out each step with out having to re-trigger. just sound more sculpting in general would be awesome too. the capabilities feel a little to thin for me a lot of the time. i would seriously use this thing all the time if i could just have a little more.</p><p>maybe i am just greedy....?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 03:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/77323/#p77323</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
