<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/5786/nanoloop-vs-lsdj/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in nanoloop vs. lsdj.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86510/#p86510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>wedanced says:</i></b><p>Things that lsdj can do that nanoloop cant...<br />I find that lsdj is just a more exact instrument to work with. everything works with very specific set quantizations and more commands can be implemented at one time or sequnced then in nanoloop. this gives you a lot of control. tables can really push out the most of your gameboys sounds. <br />as far as fm goes.... after nl 1.2 it disappeared. 1.5 added a extra voice to detune and phase one of the pulse waves with that was taken out from 1.6. nl 1.6 is supposed to include the fm features again tho.<br />other then that i feel like lsdj can make any sound that nanoloop can and do so with more accurate control.</p><p>when its all said and done tho i gotta go oldschool and cruise with flipflops. i enjoy the versatility. water and land travel no problem. carpet travel no problem. hard wood no problem. tiled no problem. tree travel no problem. tight rope no problem. underground no problem. it has a nice ride and comfortable intuitive interface.<br />highly recommended.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86510/#p86510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86505/#p86505</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>an0va says:</i></b><p>I think we found a way for LSDJ to get the NL sine kick but the FM modulation on the S channel in Nanoloop versions &lt; 1.3 are still non-replicable in LSDJ IMO</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86505/#p86505</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86504/#p86504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Evil Scientist says:</i></b><p>If someone could write a list of things nanoloop can do that lsdj can&#039;t do that&#039;d be helpful. Sound examples would be nice too.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86504/#p86504</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86503/#p86503</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Aeros says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Solarbear wrote:</cite><blockquote><p><a class="postimg" href="http://sp.theyoungriderstv.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BTTF02.jpg" title="http://sp.theyoungriderstv.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BTTF02.jpg" id="forum_image_74631735"><img src="http://sp.theyoungriderstv.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BTTF02.jpg" /></a><br />Time train? <br />Time train.</p></blockquote></div><p>well i guess this thread&#039;s been derailed as of about right now, good job guys</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86503/#p86503</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86499/#p86499</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Solarbear says:</i></b><p><a class="postimg" href="http://sp.theyoungriderstv.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BTTF02.jpg" title="http://sp.theyoungriderstv.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BTTF02.jpg" id="forum_image_11799068"><img src="http://sp.theyoungriderstv.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BTTF02.jpg" /></a><br />Time train? <br />Time train.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86499/#p86499</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86497/#p86497</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>shitbird says:</i></b><p>boats or cars??&nbsp; call in sick</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86497/#p86497</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86475/#p86475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>sammulligan says:</i></b><p>Cars stink, and boats are too main<strong>stream</strong>. I take the subway because it&#039;s still underground.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Subway Sonicbeat wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I use bycycles because it runs on different plataforms, is easy to carry and park and does not pollute,</p></blockquote></div><p>Change your name to Bicycle Sonicbeat!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86475/#p86475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86474/#p86474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Subway Sonicbeat says:</i></b><p>I use bycycles because it runs on different plataforms, is easy to carry and park and does not pollute,</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86474/#p86474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86464/#p86464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>BR1GHT PR1MATE says:</i></b><p>pshhh, and people say this site is too serious</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86464/#p86464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86458/#p86458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>an0va says:</i></b><p>Boats, because cars are totally overused.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86458/#p86458</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86456/#p86456</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>eme7h says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Edward Shallow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>you shouldn&#039;t take your car into the future, but emmett brown ignored that, didn&#039;t he?</p></blockquote></div><p>wut?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86456/#p86456</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86445/#p86445</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Frostbyte says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>godinpants wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Analog wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>nanoloop 2.5 on GBA micro + LSDJ on DMG = SEX</p></blockquote></div><p>What do they teach you kids at school? Im really worried about what will happen when you bring a girl back to your place one night.</p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86445/#p86445</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86434/#p86434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>godinpants says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Analog wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>nanoloop 2.5 on GBA micro + LSDJ on DMG = SEX</p></blockquote></div><p>What do they teach you kids at school? Im really worried about what will happen when you bring a girl back to your place one night.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86434/#p86434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86429/#p86429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Dauragon says:</i></b><p><a class="postimg" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PFzLV_OqNvQ/TAvQKY99s3I/AAAAAAAABi8/ukh-uzJPlmg/s1600/falcor.jpg" title="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PFzLV_OqNvQ/TAvQKY99s3I/AAAAAAAABi8/ukh-uzJPlmg/s1600/falcor.jpg" id="forum_image_47201369"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PFzLV_OqNvQ/TAvQKY99s3I/AAAAAAAABi8/ukh-uzJPlmg/s1600/falcor.jpg" /></a></p><p>Fuck cars and boats.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86429/#p86429</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop vs. lsdj]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86349/#p86349</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Aeros says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Edward Shallow wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>cars versus boats. discuss.</p></blockquote></div><p>hovercraft</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/86349/#p86349</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
