<![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/6456/lets-procon-nanoloop-16/ Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:47:06 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98703/#p98703 e.s.c. says:

Lfo is triangle wave

]]> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:47:06 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98703/#p98703 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98695/#p98695 egr says:
nordloef wrote:
SKGB wrote:

being an artist is a lost art. though i totally agree

yo just a random question, i'm sorry to distract this thread but what kind of waveforms can the lfo output?

I think someone else asked that in another thread and Oliver replied. Search.

I asked that, it's square only.  50% duty cycle I believe.

EDIT:  Fuuuuu, sorry that info is for the FM modulator.  Derp.

]]> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:35:03 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98695/#p98695 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98691/#p98691 disassembler says:
campbell wrote:

the price is nice!

Yep. No longer paying $80 - $90 for a Nanoloop cart.

]]> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:26:26 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/98691/#p98691 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95772/#p95772 nordloef says:
SKGB wrote:
herr_prof wrote:

Ear training is a lost art.

being an artist is a lost art. though i totally agree

yo just a random question, i'm sorry to distract this thread but what kind of waveforms can the lfo output?

I think someone else asked that in another thread and Oliver replied. Search.

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:07:05 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95772/#p95772 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95759/#p95759 shizcake says:

tri only, if i'm not mistaken

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:57:05 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95759/#p95759 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95751/#p95751 SKGB says:
herr_prof wrote:

Ear training is a lost art.

being an artist is a lost art. though i totally agree

yo just a random question, i'm sorry to distract this thread but what kind of waveforms can the lfo output?

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:26:17 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95751/#p95751 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95749/#p95749 A Versus B says:
Reteris wrote:

1.5

Who invited you?

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:55:20 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95749/#p95749 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95744/#p95744 PULSELOOPER says:
campbell wrote:

when i'm transcribing something i don't want to have to count pixels. i want actual note names.

One of the things I like most on nanoloops is that I don't have to think melodies.

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:36:33 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95744/#p95744 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95652/#p95652 Reteris says:

1.5

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:48:57 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95652/#p95652 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95647/#p95647 e.s.c. says:

con: didnt realize it was registered mail, now have to wait a few extra days to get it since i'm at work when the post office is open

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:10:16 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95647/#p95647 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95636/#p95636 A Versus B says:

The price is low because of the amount of cons...

]]> Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:02:06 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95636/#p95636 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95632/#p95632 nordloef says:
campbell wrote:

when i'm transcribing something i don't want to have to count pixels. i want actual note names.

I could always see what note it was just by looking at the location of the block. So I had no problems transcribing stuff. But yes its maybe easier for some people with actual note names. For me it doesnt really matter, both are good. smile

]]> Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:46:41 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95632/#p95632 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95620/#p95620 Rock Kandy says:

Loads fast
Note letters
Short Gated notes(for awesome noize)
-----------------------------------
No Wave Retrigger
L/R kicks don't sound as good as 1.3
No delay
Extra rom space -_-
(not needed since I bought the cart
for NL not another rom)

]]> Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:34:11 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95620/#p95620 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95609/#p95609 campbell says:

when i'm transcribing something i don't want to have to count pixels. i want actual note names.

]]> Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:16:01 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95609/#p95609 <![CDATA[Re: Let's pro/con Nanoloop 1.6]]> https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95599/#p95599 herr_prof says:

Ear training is a lost art.

]]> Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:23:22 +0000 https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/95599/#p95599