<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/712/nanoloop-15-or-23/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/15138/#p15138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>DJCactus says:</i></b><p>i havnt used 1.3 or .5 but i have 2.3 and i havnt had any trouble getting good kick sounds out of it, it still makes cool &quot;chip&quot; sounds, and i had trouble making a retro bass line but thats probably from not knowing it well enough.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/15138/#p15138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/14768/#p14768</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>mk says:</i></b><p>2.3 is really fun.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/14768/#p14768</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/14701/#p14701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>xero says:</i></b><p>i <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/heart.gif" width="15" height="15" alt="heart" /> 1.5</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/14701/#p14701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10858/#p10858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>Agreed, FM mode with the filter thinger in the lower left is very very low.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10858/#p10858</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10856/#p10856</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>albino ghost monkey says:</i></b><p>The bass does go pretty low, especially in FM mode, some of the bass is inaudible unless your runnin through a decent sub.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10856/#p10856</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10854/#p10854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Reteris wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Well, gabber kicks they may be, but they are so weak. I just find 2.3 to have lesser capabilities for bass compared to 1.5, just my opinion.</p></blockquote></div><p>Please bear in mind those are tracks recorded with literally no balancing or EQ or mixing or anything at all, from a GB micro (which doesnt sound great) into my mixer at whatever setting its on.</p><p>Out of curiosity. anyone know what the lowest note is on NL1.x vs 2.3? LSDJ is C3, im guessing 1.5 is the same? I would hazard NL2.3 goes down to c-2?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10854/#p10854</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10853/#p10853</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>albino ghost monkey says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Lazerbeat wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Acctually, one other thing, I have noticed the noise channel on 2.3 seems to be alot quieter than in 1.5 compared to other channels, is it just me?</p></blockquote></div><p>Nope not just you, the noise is definitely quieter on 2.3. I have to say that 2.3 is by far my fav right now. there is alot of sound options to choose from and havin that FM goodness is always a plus. And to note I have made some pretty gnarly gabber kicks in 2.3.&nbsp; In all I&#039;d say that nanoloop is as good as any other program and just like other programs it will take some time to get used to, but in the end I think its worth it.</p><p>I forgot, do check out Lazerbeat&#039;s 2.3 tutorial, well done and pretty much runs through all the basics.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10853/#p10853</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10850/#p10850</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>e.s.c. says:</i></b><p>ive never heard anyone complain about the gabber kicks in 2.3 before <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/hmm.png" width="15" height="15" alt="hmm" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10850/#p10850</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10848/#p10848</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Alucard says:</i></b><p>see, im a pretty big fan of bass. I love bottom end <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /> haha (all jokes welcome)</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10848/#p10848</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10847/#p10847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Reteris says:</i></b><p>Well, gabber kicks they may be, but they are so weak. I just find 2.3 to have lesser capabilities for bass compared to 1.5, just my opinion.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10847/#p10847</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10833/#p10833</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Alucard says:</i></b><p>thanks alot for all your input in this thread lazerbeat. Your really helping me out!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10833/#p10833</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10832/#p10832</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>Agreed, Gabber kicks are easy, move the filter all the way to the top left with the normal filter (the not hi pass one) and use a pitch enveloped C at the lowest or second lowest octave</p><p><a href="http://www.lazerscale2010.com/track.php?id=95" target="_blank">http://www.lazerscale2010.com/track.php?id=95</a></p><p>this is a gabberish kick in FM mode I forget exactly how</p><p><a href="http://www.lazerscale2010.com/track.php?id=120" target="_blank">http://www.lazerscale2010.com/track.php?id=120</a></p><p>And this video give a bit of an over view of song mode </p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK-ulNT8MUE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK-ulNT8MUE</a></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10832/#p10832</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10828/#p10828</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>e.s.c. says:</i></b><p>you can totally do gabber kicks in 2.3</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10828/#p10828</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10822/#p10822</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Alucard says:</i></b><p>well you cant use the song screen can you? So you cant get any idea of how it works after making your sounds. Or is everything after that easy enough?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10822/#p10822</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: nanoloop 1.5 or 2.3?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10821/#p10821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>the mist toggles says:</i></b><p>2.x is quite flexible by means of sounds and spacious by means of saving patterns...<br />However, it cannot easily sound as raw and anlalog-ish in the same way as 1.x</p><p>if you try the demos, just pay attention to the sounds that can be produced by extreme values on each parameter and you&#039;ll get the point<br />the only difference of the demo in a cart is the ability to save...the rest is the same</p><p>edit: they are both great!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/10821/#p10821</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
