<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/7566/how-an-original-chiptune-release-gets-received-by-pitchfork/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115300/#p115300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>SketchMan3 says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Stevens wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m not convinced by the argument that the audience for chipmusic consists solely of slightly nerdy console limitation-pushers and nostalgic keyjazzers though.</p></blockquote></div><p>Of course not. I mean, just look at the number of clueless-to-the-process people who come out to the shows and enjoy them? Only problem is... then they get transformed into slightly nerdy console limitation-pushers and nostalgic keyjazzers.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115300/#p115300</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115296/#p115296</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Stevens says:</i></b><p>Note that Adventure, like every squarewave-bashing artist to touch hipster media, didn&#039;t associate himself with the &#039;chipmusic scene&#039; (indeed, the comparisons the journalist makes are to Crystal Castles and Dan Deacon/Wham City, not Nullsleep and Goto80). The chipmusic scene we know and love is an impenetrable outsider ghetto totally separate from the alternative mainstream.</p><p>I&#039;m not convinced by the argument that the audience for chipmusic consists solely of slightly nerdy console limitation-pushers and nostalgic keyjazzers though. Does anybody remember Bjork bigging up Bodenstandig 2000? gwEm releasing on Shitkatapult? Quarta330 becoming a Hyperdub staple with his 100% LSDJ tracks?</p><p>Think like a Pitchfork artist and you will appear on Pitchfork. It doesn&#039;t matter if you make jazz (The Bad Plus), experimental noise (Hecker), or chipmusic (Adventure).</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115296/#p115296</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115271/#p115271</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>shitbird says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Heosphoros wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>shitbird wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s not peoples fault for not knowing how something is made, or fully understanding music at all.. I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant.....also fuck journalists and being interviewed imo. It&#039;s usually just someones job, and not a passion. The most accurate review I&#039;ve ever gotten was on someones tumbler; NOT the local&nbsp; newspaper.</p></blockquote></div><p>you seem mad.</p></blockquote></div><p>^started as an opinion, and turned into a rant, lol</p><p>or debate....ffffuuuuu&nbsp; im leaving internet</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115271/#p115271</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115264/#p115264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><p>every single pitchfork review is unreadable tripe, why would their reviews of chip stuff be any different <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />))))))))</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115264/#p115264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115260/#p115260</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Heosphoros says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>shitbird wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s not peoples fault for not knowing how something is made, or fully understanding music at all.. I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant.....also fuck journalists and being interviewed imo. It&#039;s usually just someones job, and not a passion. The most accurate review I&#039;ve ever gotten was on someones tumbler; NOT the local&nbsp; newspaper.</p></blockquote></div><p>you seem mad.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115260/#p115260</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115255/#p115255</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>SketchMan3 says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant...</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, because they&#039;re not distracted by all the internal analysis and criticism and dissecting that goes on in the mind of the musically-inclined.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115255/#p115255</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115248/#p115248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>shitbird says:</i></b><p>It&#039;s not peoples fault for not knowing how something is made, or fully understanding music at all.. I think that type of person is more sensitive to the effect music has on the mind, but at the same time completely ignorant.....also fuck journalists and being interviewed imo. It&#039;s usually just someones job, and not a passion. The most accurate review I&#039;ve ever gotten was on someones tumbler; NOT the local&nbsp; newspaper.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115248/#p115248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115245/#p115245</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Aeros says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>Heosphoros wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>To the mass media/populace, chipmusic is a novelty. For them it&#039;s the mathematical:</p><p>song I know from radio play + nostalgic bleeps and bloops = lol funny</p><p>A one listen through for jokes, a share on facebook and then a quick decay inside their minds. We shouldn&#039;t be marketing to those people at all. The fans we already have do listen to us and they do it for all the right reasons.</p></blockquote></div><p>wisdom</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115245/#p115245</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115244/#p115244</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Heosphoros says:</i></b><p>To the mass media/populace, chipmusic is a novelty. For them it&#039;s the mathematical:</p><p>song I know from radio play + nostalgic bleeps and bloops = lol funny</p><p>A one listen through for jokes, a share on facebook and then a quick decay inside their minds. We shouldn&#039;t be marketing to those people at all. The fans we already have do listen to us and they do it for all the right reasons.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115244/#p115244</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How an original Chiptune release gets received by Pitchfork]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115241/#p115241</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>nordloef says:</i></b><p>Hi!</p><p>I found this a bit interesting since most bigger websites only write about chiptune cover releases.</p><p><a href="http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/12477-adventure/" target="_blank">http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/12477-adventure/</a></p><p>I know it&#039;s a bit old but still.</p><p>/ nordloef</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/115241/#p115241</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
