<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - FastTracker II]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/8399/fasttracker-ii/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in FastTracker II.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/132798/#p132798</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>PULSELOOPER says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>xylo wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>PULSELOOPER wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Maybe there is too many buttons, it pollutes the screen. And also, I&#039;ll never get used to a horizontal pattern list, instead of vertical. </p><p>But it&#039;s probably because I&#039;ve been using FT2 for 3 years and I&#039;m used to that.</p></blockquote></div><p>I like how they&#039;ve spread out the arrangement in a horizontal pattern list, plus, doing a white styled interface was a really good idea in combination with a lot of buttons, it doesn&#039;t feel &#039;crowded&#039; to me in this way. </p><p>I like Milky as well but I still fall back to MPT when seriously making some XM&#039;s.</p></blockquote></div><p>Actually, I used MPT more for those Shiru&#039;s xm2something engines for the speccy. I never tried to make a whole song on MPT so I&#039;m sorry for my lazy opinion on the program. </p><p>Well, at least it has something I miss the most on FT2 and most old trackers: the options to duplicate/clone a pattern.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/132798/#p132798</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/132014/#p132014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>xylo says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>PULSELOOPER wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>xylo wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Why is it weird? No offense, just been wondering what people feel weird about the interface of MPT.</p></blockquote></div><p>Maybe there is too many buttons, it pollutes the screen. And also, I&#039;ll never get used to a horizontal pattern list, instead of vertical. </p><p>But it&#039;s probably because I&#039;ve been using FT2 for 3 years and I&#039;m used to that.</p></blockquote></div><p>I like how they&#039;ve spread out the arrangement in a horizontal pattern list, plus, doing a white styled interface was a really good idea in combination with a lot of buttons, it doesn&#039;t feel &#039;crowded&#039; to me in this way. </p><p>I like Milky as well but I still fall back to MPT when seriously making some XM&#039;s.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/132014/#p132014</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131962/#p131962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>PULSELOOPER says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>abortifacient wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>4mat wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>he used the R word</p></blockquote></div><p>VSTs and not limited to 4 channels. Just saying.</p></blockquote></div><p>Are we talking about Fasttracker 2 or Protracker?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131962/#p131962</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131954/#p131954</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>martin_demsky says:</i></b><p>I switched from Amiga (ProTracker, DigiBooster, OctaMED...) to PC in 1998 and started to use FT2, but i never finished nothing big because i focused more to synths and worked in Cakewalk. I hated very little position-pattern window, and that Milky Tracker is really close alternative to FTII, and player routine plays FTII tricks very well. Modplug i tried several times and if you pass his environment you can be pretty quick with this. I know some famous tracker composers, like Skaven/Future Crew who produced really great tracks with this, for example 30+ minute long multitune for Bejeweled 2.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131954/#p131954</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131953/#p131953</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>abortifacient says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>4mat wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>nf wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I don&#039;t mean to be &quot;that dude,&quot; but have you ever used Renoise? It has an FT2-style interface (with many improvements) and all the benefits of a modern DAW.</p></blockquote></div><p>he used the R word</p></blockquote></div><p>VSTs and not limited to 4 channels. Just saying.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131953/#p131953</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131951/#p131951</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>PULSELOOPER says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>xylo wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>PULSELOOPER wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>MPT interface is weird, and I don&#039;t know much about milkytracker. </p><p>but FT2 has the best tracker interface ever IMO.</p></blockquote></div><p>Why is it weird? No offense, just been wondering what people feel weird about the interface of MPT.</p></blockquote></div><p>Maybe there is too many buttons, it pollutes the screen. And also, I&#039;ll never get used to a horizontal pattern list, instead of vertical. </p><p>But it&#039;s probably because I&#039;ve been using FT2 for 3 years and I&#039;m used to that.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131951/#p131951</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131949/#p131949</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>4mat says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>nf wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>PULSELOOPER wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>MPT interface is weird, and I don&#039;t know much about milkytracker. </p><p>but FT2 has the best tracker interface ever IMO.</p></blockquote></div><p>I don&#039;t mean to be &quot;that dude,&quot; but have you ever used Renoise? It has an FT2-style interface (with many improvements) and all the benefits of a modern DAW.</p></blockquote></div><p>he used the R word</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131949/#p131949</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131948/#p131948</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>nf says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>PULSELOOPER wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>MPT interface is weird, and I don&#039;t know much about milkytracker. </p><p>but FT2 has the best tracker interface ever IMO.</p></blockquote></div><p>I don&#039;t mean to be &quot;that dude,&quot; but have you ever used Renoise? It has an FT2-style interface (with many improvements) and all the benefits of a modern DAW.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131948/#p131948</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131928/#p131928</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>xylo says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>PULSELOOPER wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>MPT interface is weird, and I don&#039;t know much about milkytracker. </p><p>but FT2 has the best tracker interface ever IMO.</p></blockquote></div><p>Why is it weird? No offense, just been wondering what people feel weird about the interface of MPT.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131928/#p131928</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131775/#p131775</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>PULSELOOPER says:</i></b><p>MPT interface is weird, and I don&#039;t know much about milkytracker. </p><p>but FT2 has the best tracker interface ever IMO.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131775/#p131775</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131752/#p131752</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Downstate says:</i></b><p>i love MPT myself</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131752/#p131752</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131748/#p131748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>chunter says:</i></b><p>Get Impulse Tracker or Schism Tracker as well, try them all!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131748/#p131748</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131744/#p131744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>xylo says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>4mat wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>OpenMPT is horrible to use and not really anything like the smooth workflow of FastTracker 2.&nbsp; If you&#039;re looking for a &quot;modern version&quot; then Milkytracker is your best bet.&nbsp; But tbh even that has some odd design choices that make it a second-best choice.</p><p>Yeah, manual is probably a good bet but the best way you&#039;ll learn is just loading in a bunch of XMs and looking at what they&#039;re doing.&nbsp; It also has a built-in help system with all commands and shortcuts (just click the Help button on the main screen) and you don&#039;t need much more than that.</p></blockquote></div><p>I love OpenMPT&#039;s use. </p><p>As for the thread-opener, just try out both and find out what you like best.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131744/#p131744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131545/#p131545</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><p>as 4mat says there is an inbuitt&nbsp; help system and a manual. if you have tracked with madtracker and goat tracker you already know how to track and fasttracker 2 is just a tracker after all, you don&#039;t need a tutorial you just need a manual</p><p>also i agree with 4mat milkytracker and openmpt are not similar to ft2 (milkytracker is really crazy, dunno why they did those &quot;improvements&quot; that they did). ft2 or IT are actually still the best trackers for making modules in my eyes, sadly, althought openmpt is undoubtedly very powerful and quite easy learning curve</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 22:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131545/#p131545</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: FastTracker II]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131524/#p131524</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>XyNo says:</i></b><p>yeah jefftheworld tuto is a good start...and keep looking youtube I know there is some strobe tutorials on it somewhere if I remember well !!! <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/131524/#p131524</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
