<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[ChipMusic.org - How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
		<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/topic/9622/how-are-soundfonts-different-to-samplepacks-in-lgpt/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:06:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147977/#p147977</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>herr_prof says:</i></b><p>Loop points and mapping should be supported.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147977/#p147977</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147976/#p147976</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>egr says:</i></b><p>Interesting, I never took the time to learn about soundfonts, now they sound really useful.</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147976/#p147976</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147973/#p147973</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><p>viena and vienna are not the same <img src="https://chipmusic.org/forums/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" /></p><p>awave is very nice though! i didn&#039;t know it had sound-font specific features such as volume envelopes and stuff, but it is definitely worth having anyway!</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147973/#p147973</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147968/#p147968</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>martin_demsky says:</i></b><p>Vienna was native creative labs editor in the days of sb awe64 era but Awave Studio was best in my opinion, very quick</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147968/#p147968</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147965/#p147965</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Saskrotch says:</i></b><div class="quotebox"><cite>ant1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p> i think it can also play back more than one sample per note.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yep!</p><p>I&#039;m actually working on a little basic soundfont tutorial that I&#039;ll post once I get some other stuff done to release with it .</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147965/#p147965</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147961/#p147961</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>ant1 says:</i></b><p>yeah saskrotch hit the nail on the head</p><p>the main advantage is that a different sample can be mapped to each note, or to arbitrary ranges of notes-- similar to what most rompling keyboards do. basic volume/pitch envelope stuff can also be done with it -- some of the 808 sounds in the microsoft set (the kick and the tom at least) are just made from sine waves with pitch envelopes, and i think it can also play back more than one sample per note.</p><p>i don&#039;t know how many of these features will be supported in piggy</p><p>the best editor is, i think, viena: <a href="http://www.synthfont.com/Viena_news.html" target="_blank">http://www.synthfont.com/Viena_news.html</a></p><p>the main application in piggy (which generally produces artificial-sounding music anyway) will probably be drum kits - but putting them together might be more hassle than it is worth. the microsoft GS set (GM.DLS) has 808 and 909 kits in it plus a few others that you can use if you convert it to sf2</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147961/#p147961</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147960/#p147960</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Saskrotch says:</i></b><p>also you can have more than one sample per preset, like a drum kit, or having a different recording each octave to keep it from getting too pitch-shifty sounding</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147960/#p147960</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147959/#p147959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Cooshinator says:</i></b><p>Soundfonts have built-in loop points, and thus sound somewhat more &quot;natural&quot;</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147959/#p147959</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147958/#p147958</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Hayze says:</i></b><p>Never used soundfounts in piggy, but I use the piggy on my PSP.<br />With .Wav samples you can change the filter, downsample, crush, etc.<br />I&#039;m guessing with soundfonts maybe you could do the same?</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147958/#p147958</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How are soundfonts different to samplepacks in LGPT?]]></title>
			<link>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147956/#p147956</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b><i>Lazerbeat says:</i></b><p>I know piggy has soundfont support but im a bit confused about how they differ from just a collection of samples. Can anyone break down the advantages of using soundfonts in piggy for me. Assume im a complete idiot on this topic....</p>]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://chipmusic.org/forums/post/147956/#p147956</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
