Thoughts on Streaming (Page 7 of 8)

I bet Henry Homesweet would do one. He did his whole Lo-Bit Bassment thing which was basically a series of prerecorded web shows.

I have to say I agree with what Boa is trying to say... if your webstream is your best foot forward and it looks silly and amateurish to the uniformed it isn't going to serve very well as a promotional tool, no matter how much clothes your friends puts on the emperor. The idea of a stream as a online party is fun, but I think you have to look at the results more objectively before you start praising them as the ideal.

Thats not to say im against bootlegs, but I think you have to be really careful how you are portrayed in the media if you expect to be taken seriously (of course if this is even your goal).

Pretty much. 

i'm not sure how many people see streaming of chipmusic as "THE NEXT BIG PHENOMENON THAT'Z TAKING THE WORLD BY STORM", or a soon-to-be predominant way that chip is proliferated, or anything like that.

i get that streams do have the potential of hurting the integrity of whatever else you've put out there though.   i think that's where i found myself feeling the most conflicted tbh.

on one hand, considering i've really only played like 1.5 live performances to date, i was actually quite pleased with how my clipstream set turned out.  it was fun to prepare for and i think it was representative of the tunes and other resources i had at my disposal.  i think i did about as good as i could have with a single-camera setup and no visuals.  and as much as a live performance flies in the face of my perfectionist nature with respect to releasing anything over any medium, it was a fun thing to do in the moment and it was great to get to know other chip artists better in the process.

On the other hand, is that recorded stream something i would use as "press material" per se?  probably not.  most people who don't understand where a chip streamer is coming from would scoff at it or dismiss it, which is why i haven't shared it on facebook.  i don't think such a set represents the kind of "whole package" i would want to put forth, which i think would entail some kind of multisensory experience.  what that experience would look, i haven't had the time/energy to formulate yet, but i'm pretty sure it doesn't involve me bopping in front of a camera for half an hour.

so there's this weird internal conflict between
a) the idea that i'm free can do whatever i feel like in a live stream and people can enjoy it in the moment for what it's worth, and
b) the fact that this supposedly spontaneous event has been recorded for on-demand viewing - taking away from the spontaneity and intimacy of the live act, and giving undesired permanency to any mistakes or other aspects that we'd like forgotten.

I wonder if people might feel differently about streaming if there was an unwritten rule in the chipscene that any live streams should only be broadcast and recorded?  or at least, that any recorded streams get deleted after a couple of days?

It's not like in chipmusic the rules on things have to be different though, I don't really get why some people make this aesthetic a special case. Your average listener probably has a bunch of chipmusic mp3s in their music folder along with everything else they listen to, I doubt they're going "NOW I'M LISTENING TO CHIPMUSIC FOR AN HOUR.  I MUST PREPARE FIRST."   Quite frankly I'm glad we're not stuck with releasing music as source files anymore, having to attach a bunch of instructions before people can hear the damned things.  Anyway, this thread seems to be another one where the question is "how would musicians in general approach doing a webcast?" and probably just googling that would come up with answers.

Good topic and I think it's relevant to address this. For me, it depends on what you mean. I am a huge fan of actual concerts being streamed in audio and/or video. It's interesting to be observing the party from the outside, see the interactions between artist and audience, and most importantly to learn how so many of us can not and never will be able to dance

But playing a "webshow" is something I'm not particularly a fan of. I've been interested in trying one myself, but I know I would have to figure out some creative and enticing way to keep it entertaining. IMO, you simply cannot take the same approach you would have to a normal, in-the-flesh show...I think it's near-embarrassing to be watching someone just tweak out in their bedroom/basement while hearing a super crisp line-in signal or even just as bad when you hear the ambience of a room with only one person in there wailing it out. Sometimes the live webcam show idea works though; I think Radiohead actually was a great example of this (regardless how you feel about their music) when they played through In Rainbows on a live stream in the studio with stuff like multi-cam angles and choreographed video clips; but if you're not bringing anything new to the table and you're doing something like just sitting at a desk and staring into the webcam then you are not playing a show-you are debuting songs to a chat room. I don't see any real difference then between that and something like turntable.fm, which is already a mighty fine establishment, but you can start to see the confusion there now between the two mediums

This is just my (probably unpopular) opinion on the matter but I think the reason for this discrepancy is that a huge element of playing live is the ability to feed off of and respond to the audience's reactions be them positive OR negative. Sometimes this even is the deciding factor between a good and a bad show over the actual quality of the music and many artists in any genre still struggle to realize this. On a "webshow" this is simply not possible save for reading through a chatlog of text responses and I think this is the Achilles' heel of the entire underlying idea behind playing a "webshow" live.

Last edited by an0va (Dec 21, 2012 2:03 am)