Offline
Memphis, TN

So in the past I have been very purposeful with my track titling under other aliases, but currently, under this one, I am having a science project. I am not giving actual names describing the music to my 'officially' released tracks, such as my debut release 'D': http://ateno.bandcamp.com/
I am wondering whether the name of a track that imposes meaning onto a song can be deemed more meaningful than a track that leaves finding the meaning up to the listener, or vice-versa.

What are your thoughts on this? I have seen a lot of tracks with seemingly meaningless names, and others that I think are actually describing the music, so which do you prefer?

Offline
NC in the US of America

Works either way.

Offline
Playboy Man-Baby

I released a 'theme' album and the theme was only held together by the track titles themselves.

Offline
Baja California

Some song I compose with an idea in mind, the I can think on a apropiate title for it. But since I can't get the hang of naming a song usually after finishing a song I name it the first thing I can get in my mind. I know it sounds lazy, but no one cares, so I lose nothing.

Offline
Earth

I guess it should be like writing an essay. You name it at the end (if you're like me). Describe the experience of writing it, if you must. Obviously, if you name your songs a b c d e f g ... it won't be as memorable. It puts more responsibility on the tracks to distinguish themselves. Unless your like Basic Channel, and you just release these dense continuous sound fields. Generally, if you don't have a reason to break the rules.. just follow them, I think. Unless you want to make a statement through deviation.. Just name your songs names. =P

Last edited by breakphase (Mar 12, 2014 5:46 am)

Offline
Dallas, Texas

I agree with the above. What I normally end up doing is first coming up with an idea musically. Something that is going to be sparking the song. It could be a little diddy, or it could already have the makings of a legit track, but the idea is to have something. Then I name it that will help me remember how it sounds. Like if it its kinda high energy with a distinctive drop I might call it 'Blakka Doom' or 'Thunder Block'. Or if it is softer, more ambient and/or low energy I might go for titles more like 'Sly Horizon' or 'Vibronic Trace'. I usually start with onomatopoeic words. Though if my idea turns out to have a very particular mood to it already, I might go out and give it a title that sounds good and proper. Changing the titles are always fair game for me, at least before the track is completed.   

FearOfDark has some examples of terrifically fitting names for tracks based on their content such as 'The Last Dinosaur'. Its the best example of musical story telling I can think of and keeping the title in mind whilst listening definitely takes you on a grand journey.

Offline
Earth
TylerBarnes wrote:

FearOfDark has some examples of terrifically fitting names for tracks based on their content such as 'The Last Dinosaur'. Its the best example of musical story telling I can think of and keeping the title in mind whilst listening definitely takes you on a grand journey.

I've always thought it was very similar to story telling (writing music). You face the same challenges of holding people's attention, and leading them to something that will be entertaining.

Last edited by breakphase (Mar 12, 2014 6:53 am)

Offline

This is an important topic to me for sure!

I'm really, really obsessive about track names to the point of I have lots of unreleased material just waiting for an adequate name.

I grew up listening to a lot of prog rock and loved the idea of an album being a concept. With instrumental music, that concept is a little more difficult to achieve. You don't have language in the actual songs to tell a story so instead you're basically creating an atmosphere of different feelings and emotions - an an0va release (to me) is a package of these and it's probably the main reason why although I write music very often...I release, promote, and sell very little of it (only two releases, to be exact).

The track name is an unfortunate wrench in the gears to this idea - you're forced to use language as a labelling system. And though in many cases it really doesn't matter what you name a track, to me the track name is the first impression a listener has to your song before they even begin to play it. Of course, this doesn't matter if they hear your track before seeing it (like if played live or on the radio), but in the context of a release everything for me has to be pretty mathematical.

With my first album I really liked what minusbaby did with "Left," so I kind of made a slight nod to that by having each song title represent different acts of some silly short story I made up. I later discarded the story altogether because even though some people really liked it, I realized many people don't like things spelled out for them and in many instances, they attach some personal situation of their own to it. I followed up on this with my second album and titled the songs appropriately to their individual meaning but also as a vague nod to what's going on in the actual music. It's probably the closest I'll ever get in my life to telling some vague story without words and I'm more than okay with that. But the best part about that for me is: if someone listens to it and has a completely different interpretation than intended that is more than fine with me. They can have some type of life situation behind it or just call it video game mario bleeps and bloops and neither one is wrong. What matters to me is if they enjoyed it or not, and hopefully it entertained them for even a couple minutes of a song. I guess that's what I think of entertainment in general to be - anything that just successfully distracts you (if even for a brief moment) from how lame real life is.

Now that's out of the way, this is something I want to get rid of or maybe just shelve for a little bit - the music I've been working on (even within chiptune) is a little more varied and outthere and I think it would be stupid to force some type of concept on it. Sometimes, the best title is just the best descriptive of the song's feel. Or just something catchy enough to stick. idk


tl;dr - i put useless psuedoscience titles on top of pokemon sounds

Last edited by an0va (Mar 12, 2014 8:03 am)

Offline
South Jersey, USA

When naming tracks I just ask myself 'what would Morrissey do?'

Offline
/dev/sda2

When it comes to naming tracks, I usually just mash the keyboard, and there's my title.

Offline
Brunswick, GA USA

Track titles can lead to high listen counts from curious people who checked out the song from a search term, but otherwise, if I can't think of something I want to say in a title I'll use Wikipedia and pick random articles until something looks appropriate.

Offline
Ottawa, Ontario

importance of memes

Offline

I don't give two thirds of a fuck, to the point where I may think of one I like and just write it down for later, applying it randomly to whatever track needs a title. Usually I try to come up with something preposterous and ultimately meaningless, hopefully on the spot when I'm creating the first save file for the track.

I DO avoid single word titles, and anything in the realm of working titles like "Happy Song" or "Wicked Riff Number 2".

I don't really try to describe the music in a title, but the song may suggest certain imagery.

I have a MUCH harder time thinking of band or project names. That kind of thing is way too final and important, and it freaks me out. I don't even like "Vaina Moinen" all that much, but it's the best I could come up with and I've accepted it.

Offline
Holland

Release aaaaall the french named songs.

Offline
The Grid

Labels are labels, it's really about what it means to you.