17

(1,620 replies, posted in General Discussion)

trash80 wrote:


2x coffees
1x redstripe


10 year old hand me down pioneer vsx-401 sender: $0.00 (top right)
Fairly new hand me down home theater system sub woofer: $0.00 (top)
pathetic hand me down windows 98 desktop speakers (complete with bass speaker): $0.00 (tiny white speakers)
at least 20 year old hand me down house speakers: $0.00
15 year old hand me down yamaha psr-140 keyboard: $0.00 (between the house speakers)
5 year old hand me down DD-55 electronic drum set: $0.00
5 year old Austin bizarre electric guitar: $200.00
6 year old acoustic guitar (complete with case): $100.00 (the symbol says "ho" its Japanese short hand for "hoshi" meaning "star"
A constant feeling of inadequacy: priceless wink

Thank moai of earth my studio doesnt look this bad anymore, its slightly less shitty, but hey thats what happens when you dont have a job.

18

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

boomlinde wrote:

lol im not going to lie
i like how you did that (not even being sarcastic)

19

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

infradead wrote:
Reteris wrote:

You've got to be fucking kidding me


yup

kind of a sad day when daft punk becomes that kanye west sample

sorry i forgot there names
im not really into the club thing

20

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

minusbaby wrote:
Piksel Blue wrote:

easier tune customization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-Tune

thank you?

21

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

infradead wrote:
Piksel Blue wrote:

simpler interface
easier tune customization
stronger
faster
better than it was before


stronger
faster
better

dude. 

if you're not going to seriously answer why bother.

give specifics w/ what bothers you and what you want to see.

stronger midi implantation? 
better OSC !?!?
faster... ...  ...  yah this one makes no sense.

also sunvox is awesome to play with.

umm

simpler interface
easier tune customization

the faster, stronger thing was a joke
you know that one kanye west song sample
i guess you didnt get it

22

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

egr wrote:

To paraphrase nitro2k01 --

Hey Piksel Blue!  You seem like someone that is just starting out and has lots of basic questions.  I invite you to try a community more suited to your needs:  http://8bc.org/

i think its down

23

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

µB wrote:

Actually, that was an insult, not a troll bait.

whatever from now on im just going to ignore the douchebags
shaken, not stirred?
lol nice:)

24

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

Saskrotch wrote:

this guy sucks

^lol troll bait^

25

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

tacticalbread wrote:

Yes, all three of them are under trackers (not chip trackers).

ok thnx

26

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

µB wrote:

If you want the power of a DAW to create your tunes, then by all means, use one. There's plenty of plugins that allow you to make chipmusic in a full-scale software studio.

If you want to keep the tracker interface, have a look at Renoise, Psycle, Buzz or forks/clones of them.

the names your throwing out
r they on woolsys (<--might be spelled wrong)

27

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

tacticalbread wrote:

For creating NES tunes?

NTRQ, and the upcoming Pulsar will do that, along with MML.

or just trackers in general?
http://woolyss.com/tracking-trackers.php
http://woolyss.com/chipmusic-chiptrackers.php

wow its like the mother load
thanx man

28

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

infradead wrote:

define better?

simpler interface
easier tune customization
stronger
faster
better than it was before

29

(56 replies, posted in Software & Plug-ins)

Ive been searching google for about an hour looking for a better tracker than famitracker
is there a vst or software around better than fami?

(im not looking for any kind of hardware or anything else outside of my pc)

30

(50 replies, posted in General Discussion)

George wrote:

Can't believe this topic hasn't been closed yet.

uh huh?

31

(18 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Feryl wrote:

If you have no idea why you're making chip music, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

Something to think about, anyway. smile

bleo wrote:

Because it's so much better than reading these retarded threads.

wow thats kind of a dick thing to say but whatever
you two r probably just suffering from some sort of insecurity.
really not my problem.:\
just let me know when your ready to stop being a jerk:)

32

(18 replies, posted in General Discussion)

arfink wrote:

See, it's like this:

1. MAKE MUSIC
2. ???
3. PROFIT!

Only I wouldn't know, I haven't made much music in my day. Mostly for me it's like this:

1. MAKE HARDWARE
2. ???
3. PROFIT

1. Make music
2. "Not give a fuck"?
3. Profit