backpacked and pumped! is anyone still interested in pizza saturday?
17 May 25, 2012 5:09 am
Re: [US] NEW YORK NY • 2012 05 25-27 • BLIP FESTIVAL NYC 2012 (360 replies, posted in Past Events)
19 May 22, 2012 4:18 am
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse Vol. 2 - Various Awesome Artists (56 replies, posted in Releases)
THE FUN NEVER ENDS
20 May 22, 2012 4:17 am
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse Vol. 2 - Various Awesome Artists (56 replies, posted in Releases)
hahaha love those guys
21 May 21, 2012 8:19 am
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse Vol. 2 - Various Awesome Artists (56 replies, posted in Releases)
iPhone Nanoloop Those Guys
22 May 20, 2012 9:01 pm
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse Vol. 2 - Various Awesome Artists (56 replies, posted in Releases)
iPhone Nanoloop Posse: We are totally those guys.
23 May 19, 2012 4:16 am
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse Vol. 2 - Various Awesome Artists (56 replies, posted in Releases)
not to be that guy, but my track title should read "Boston, MA 41C0128".
again, I AM TOTALLY NOT THAT GUY.
24 May 18, 2012 7:03 pm
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse Vol. 2 - Various Awesome Artists (56 replies, posted in Releases)
hey lets talk about how awesome interrobangs are
25 May 15, 2012 9:21 pm
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse 2? [DROPS TUESDAY YO] (135 replies, posted in Collaborations)
campbell wrote:[airhorn]
LET'S F*** S*** UP! ** fist pumps **
what's the chipmusic.org equivalent of flipping over a cop car?
26 May 15, 2012 9:02 pm
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse 2? [DROPS TUESDAY YO] (135 replies, posted in Collaborations)
[airhorn]
27 May 14, 2012 5:18 am
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse 2? [DROPS TUESDAY YO] (135 replies, posted in Collaborations)
BR1GHT PR1MATE wrote:\o
o/ \o
With you all the way, bro. XD
what a beautiful internet moment.
28 May 14, 2012 1:29 am
Re: iPhone Nanoloop Posse 2? [DROPS TUESDAY YO] (135 replies, posted in Collaborations)
NO! ONLY MONO AND 64KBPS
the whole release will be encoded as a single .wma file and will be available via a special edition iRiver player release.
29 May 12, 2012 4:26 am
Re: BLIP ROLL CALL (NYC 2012 EDITION) (126 replies, posted in General Discussion)
Since we're all kinda disorganized and the people that do wanna meet up tend to not live in NYC, you guys should PM each your numbers/e-mails and see if you can reference someone from NYC so you can set up a time and a place. Once you do that you can then post it on here so we can all join in.
is this concern filed under the "pizza" category or the "other" category? if pizza, i figure we can just call a time to meet in front of the gramercy, grab slices at the various and sundry pizza places in the area, and converge on madison square park for a chillsesh.
how does 6:30 on saturday sound to people?
30 May 11, 2012 5:07 am
Re: is retro computing going to be viable in the future (28 replies, posted in General Discussion)
boomlinde wrote:I've been toying with the thought that at some point, all our knowledge of some old computers will mostly be based on slightly inaccurate emulators, which means that over a long period of time our ideas of what they were might change a lot. Especially machines that haven't been treated as well as the C64 when it comes to emulation. Many emulators already allow you to set up configurations that would have been impossible on the original machines. WinUAE and recent "classic" amiga software development springs to mind. In WinUAE, you can set the CPU emulation (and chipram and the blitter!) up to be as fast as the host computer can muster. A lot of new software (and whole OS distributions) take advantage of this to the point that they are useless even on the fastest real Amiga accelerators. Mplayer for 68k Amigas? Exists. Amigas that can run it? None, unless you like slideshows. Retro revisionism!
This is really interesting to me. Simply stating so is far from a useful contribution but, yeah... retro revisionism. Revisionism is scary. This is reminding me of 1984, the book. Though now my imagination is taking hold of the subject.
woah. we are hardcore broaching the topic of subjective reality over time. THIS THREAD GOES HARD OR NOT AT ALL.
31 May 10, 2012 5:55 am
Re: is retro computing going to be viable in the future (28 replies, posted in General Discussion)
christ that was long.
32 May 10, 2012 5:54 am
Re: is retro computing going to be viable in the future (28 replies, posted in General Discussion)
this is very true:
the more complicated the device, the more things there are which can go wrong/break. however some components have expiry dates, so in that way the older things may die first because of part selection rather than the fundamental design.
whenever i think about this issue, i often think about virtualization and the idea of "movable retro".
as far as virtualization goes, we've already seen rapidly growing development of virtual versions of dedicated hardware/software (nes emulators, nitrotracker for nds, universal audio plugins, arturia software synthesizers). as computing power increases and multitouch, gesture-based, and haptic interfaces continue to gain traction in the electronic music community, i can only see this trend continuing.
"movable retro" is a phrase i just made up because i can't think of anything catchier right now. even gear that i think of as recent is starting to gain a fine retro crust. isn't it hard to believe that the microKORG has been around for a decade? the same goes for "non-musical" gear as well (aughties flip-phones, the aforementioned playstation, etc).
what's really more important, though, is the general mindset that retro gear puts you in. the idea of having no more than five channels to work with can be really inspiring for us, so continued development of flexible, minimalist synthesis technology will be crucial. i'm thinking specifically along the lines of barebones computing projects like the raspberry pi or diy digital synths like the meeblip or shruthi. even analog desktop synths have been surprisingly stripped-down lately: the dsi tetra and moog slim phatty both present a healthy ratio of possibility/constraint for my taste.