First of all, ew why do you use 3-3 groove that's almost as bad as using 7F for your empty chains.
Second, something I often do and something I think that song does is use noise instruments that take a tick or two to register. When the hi-hat switches to quarter notes, you can hear that they sort of have a "flam" effect because they start out with a lower pitch and a tick later switch to a more open pitch (which might be hard to pull off in 3-3). This keeps the hi-hat locked into the groove while making it feel like it's a bit behind, and also it makes for a more interesting hi-hat in general
Third, mixing and sound design are everything. He's using fairly punchy/abrupt kick and noise instruments, and all the other parts are mixed down a little to give the beat room to sing. Punchier percussion isn't always better, but it often gives you the freedom to make better use of dynamics, and stuff that makes good use of dynamics is usually more groovy.
Fourth, I think the background arps help more than you might think. Arps have this weird thing where, if you use them fast and rhythmically like that song, they make sense while you're listening, because the brain realizes they're supposed to be one chord. But you also hear certain important notes triggering just after or before the song's subdivisions, so they have this weird effect in making the groove sound a little more "stuttered".
Finally, I think the song is composed well enough and with enough variation in rhythm to give the groove enough to play with so that it never falls stagnant. It's easy to hear a rhythmical loop in lsdj and think "oh, this will never go anywhere", but if you write around it well enough and mix things up from time to time, I'm sure you'll find yourself liking it a little more. And cool tip: try writing music with the volume turned pretty low. If you can get it sounding groovy while it's quiet, it'll sound even groovier when it's loud.
Last edited by Cooshinator (Apr 9, 2016 4:47 pm)