I was thinking about abstract categories. Your implication is false, there are objects which aren't random but without period neither, see for example geometric progression. But there is no random object with period. You have to notice/assume something more to put an equivalence to these statements. Perhaps you was talking about common general rule, where I could agree.
Computer's inability to be random you have stated isn't an immanent property.
Greetings.
That's all semantics, the sentence is correct either way. Get over it. :3