1 Reply by radiantx

(37 replies, posted in Commodore Computers)

nitro pulse wrote:

It does what every other c64 tracker can...

Let's see...

  • No hard restart

  • Very simple wavetable logic, filter controls etc

  • Resulting binary files are 4-8x as large as from other editors

  • Rastertime usage is 1) very inconsistent 2) much higher than for example GoatTracker 2, despite GT2 having a much greater featureset

That's just what I could learn from a quick glance.

Go to forum: Commodore Computers

2 Reply by radiantx

(13 replies, posted in Commodore Computers)

Well, Wikipedia is all about notability. GoatTracker isn't really known outside of a small set of people, and there are no mainstream sources reporting on it that I know of. LSDj is a bit more known, but still quite esoteric. Should be notable enough for an article though, IMO, and there seems to be some agreement about that.

Go to forum: Commodore Computers

3 Topic by radiantx

(1 replies, posted in General Discussion)

http://www.linusakesson.net/chipophone/index.php

Lft is at it again - I'm amazed by his resourcefulness.

Go to forum: General Discussion