Offline
Psydney, Australia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoatTracker

WTF?

Offline
Chicago IL

ta-da
http://web.archive.org/web/200802241021 … oatTracker

Offline
BOSTON

yeah, they did the same thing to the LSDJ and nonoloop pages a while ago. Someone in wikipedia hates chiptune sad

Offline
Psydney, Australia

Yeah I know how to dig it up, I was just wondering why the removal in the first place. I checked the guy who removed the page and he seems like a full-time wikipedia admin.

Can we like petition them or something? If this is just somebody's whim, we better act up on it sooner than later.
I'm not sure wikipedia is supposed to function that way.

Offline
Minneapolis

I read the guy's post where he complained that the sources the article quotes aren't reliable. I think he need to have his head staved in. Go for it iLKke!

Offline
BOSTON

raid?

Offline
Psydney, Australia
arfink wrote:

I read the guy's post where he complained that the sources the article quotes aren't reliable. I think he need to have his head staved in. Go for it iLKke!

Shouldn't it go like, help improve this article by bla bla, suggested for deletion on the basis of bla bla, etc?

BR1GHT PR1MATE wrote:

raid?

Tower rush?

I think several of us should send some complaints together or something.
Let me see if I can figure out how it's done...

Offline
Plano, TX

We'll have to get LSDJ, Milktracker, et al. on an episode of Family Guy in order for it to be of relevance to the guys that edit Wikipedia.

Offline
Psydney, Australia
PixyJunket wrote:

We'll have to get LSDJ, Milktracker, et al. on an episode of Family Guy in order for it to be of relevance to the guys that edit Wikipedia.

Don't we all edit wikipedia? In theiry, at least? big_smile

Offline
Psydney, Australia

Btw, LSDJ article is now in the incubator, meaning it can be improved and ressurected:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pohta … ohtit/LSDJ

Offline
Manchester UK

what exactly 'isnt reliable' about it though?  :-/

__________________
retrovgm.blogspot.com

Last edited by GaMEcat (Jul 20, 2010 9:07 pm)

Offline
WOW MAN!

I personally think it's a fucking ridiculous situation. Nice that someone's hard work (10 years in the case of LSDJ!) can be rendered irrelevant by these idiots and then you've got this;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonas_Brothers

or this;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Kids_on_the_Block

or this;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Andre

Muppets mad

Offline
hardcore, Australia

Look on the brightside, maybe they'll hit the dubstep article soon.

Offline

Well, Wikipedia is all about notability. GoatTracker isn't really known outside of a small set of people, and there are no mainstream sources reporting on it that I know of. LSDj is a bit more known, but still quite esoteric. Should be notable enough for an article though, IMO, and there seems to be some agreement about that.