godinpants wrote:
likeluke wrote:

it just seemed to me mildly implied from godinpants that the chip scene shouldn't take itself seriously at all, but i think i'm on the same page as he is/you are/the scene is.

I dont think i ever said we shouldn't take ourselves seriously at all.

i think i will agree with 10k that it could come down to cultural differences, Australia does have an attitude of needing to be able to make joke about yourself.

Probably this could branch off into it's own thread if you want to go deeper into chip behavioural studies.


Sorry for throwing your train off the rails triforce.

as i said before, it SEEMED implied, but i think we're pretty eye to eye at this point, don't think further investigation is required. i'd go along with misconstrued statements via philosophical arguments not face to face, as well as something getting lost in translation from AUS to US. but who knows how this crazy scene works!

dosprompt wrote:
likeluke wrote:

the point i was trying to make was simply that chip artists as a whole don't need to rely on wackiness or humor to get the full message of their art across.

Artists in other genres do things unrelated to their music to get their point across, whether humourous or otherwise. Lady Gaga with her "scandalous" costumes and filmclips is a prime example. Everyone tries to create and maintain an image when they are on stage (frequently with a very different stage persona to their actual persona), not just chip musicians. It may be true that a lot of chip artists (especially - as godinpants said - in Sydney) have somewhat less serious personas that are funnier and more out there, but that doesn't make their music any less good, but it can make people stop and turn around and listen to what they're doing instead of going outside for a cigarette when someone pulls out a gameboy.

again, i understand completely, and have never said that people shouldn't utilize a live element in order to give a full experience. that was never the debate here, nor was it whether or not it cheapens the music it accompanies. the example you give of lady gaga falls close to my example of nullsleep or starscream, who indeed don't take themselves fully seriously, but do take their art seriously. it just seemed to me mildly implied from godinpants that the chip scene shouldn't take itself seriously at all, but i think i'm on the same page as he is/you are/the scene is.

calmdownkidder wrote:
likeluke wrote:

just look at nullsleep or starscream; their live shows will have accompanying visuals, but they're not necessary for them to be powerful live, OR to get their art across (even though it certainly does bring it to an amazing new plateau). it could certainly be construed that they take themselves seriously to some degree, and look at what they're accomplishing.

Again though, that's taking the art seriously, not themselves. Nullsleep and Starscream have a massive sense of humour, even though their 'personal branding' is srs bsns. I think the point is when you take yourselves too seriously, it can seem a little po-faced and pretentious. I felt that a little from the "oh hai we're just chilling in the garden" bit at the beginning of this video, didn't really have a meaning IMO.

that's true indeed. i was about to take this thread in a mildly meta direction ("IF ART IS AN EXTENSION OF ONESELF THAN MUSTN'T WE BLAH BLAH FRUITCUP ETC."), but realized i would probably have to take myself fairly srsly to want to take it that far. tongue
in any case, i agree that you don't need to treat yourself more importantly than need be as an artist, otherwise you just turn into sort of a prick; the point i was trying to make was simply that chip artists as a whole don't need to rely on wackiness or humor to get the full message of their art across.
as for the beginning of the video, i reiterate that i would have been more alright with it without the song of storms playing.

i'm also wondering if this crazy thread is at all the response that triforce was expecting.

and i guess at this point i should say something about the video. not bad, BUT

-doesn't focus enough on the music, and if you're aiming for a chip music audience specifically, or if that's what you want to show a NON-chip audience, then it doesn't focus enough on that aspect in the music you do show.
-you really don't need the song of storms bit at the beginning, it just seems out of place with what it's accompanying and distracts from your own music. should probably just have your own music playing for the whole video, and by the way
-the whole video could be shorter. to expect to hold someone's attention for that long is unfair (and i really hate that i believe that myself).
-frankly i don't see any reason you NEED to label yourself as an "8-bit band", why not just discuss your music for what it is as opposed to one instrument in it? i understand that being chip sets you apart to some degree, but the music can really speak for itself, and you can back it up.

godinpants wrote:
likeluke wrote:

i don't think taking oneself seriously as a musician is a problem here. to say that "we know chipmusic is ridiculous" sort of keeps us in this "revenge of the nerds"-esque way of thinking of what we do; "yeah, this shit is really nerdy and not quite socially acceptable, so what?" why not take ourselves seriously enough to tell the world "this is actually a really awesome thing we do, all appearances aside"? instead of affirming--or straight up relishing in--the outsider nature of chip, we need to take ourselves at least SLIGHTLY seriously as musicians; otherwise, chip might as well be wizard rock or nerdcore. (no offense to wizard rock or nerdcore enthusiasts on the board.)

I think there's a difference between taking yourself seriously and taking your music seriously.
i take my music seriously, enough to spend a lot on it for vinyl/transport/instrumentation all that, to put my time and hardwork into it, to get in fights with my girlfriend over touring.
What i dont take seriously is myself when dealing with my music, based off album covers im half man, half whale. i wear home made godinpants t shirts and strange hats(not so much lately on that one). and i think the attitude is largely the same in a lot of other people.
i know 10k takes incredible pride in the production values of his music, ive seen mixing/recording going down. but on stage, its almost like the music is a vehicle for comedy in between and during songs.
abortifacient gets all dressed up in corpse paint and ken dole shirts, adamgetsawesome still uses a picture of himself as a cardboard robot, even anamanaguchi do some really hi-fi recording, and combine it with art from paul robertson, who himself does some amazing drawings that just cannot be taken seriously.

I think having that space really helps people engage with what you're doing, it makes things memorable and more enjoyable.

i think i see what you mean, and agree that it helps bridge a gap; this sort of implies, however, that if you're NOT doing something ironically silly while playing live, people won't "get it". i think that really depends on the artist.
for example, i'm actually IN anamanaguchi (just fyi ;p), and i agree that the art we use is often completely crazy and indeed can't be taken totally seriously. but it's also serving the purpose of visually expressing what's going on, which, as i said, is bridging a sort of gap for people who come to a show or download our records, as our music could often be described as "over the top". the same could be said of 10k to an extent; were his music and live shows not so crazy or out of the ordinary, it wouldn't be serving the same purpose for him to be so comical.
i feel like your example won't necessarily apply across the board to all chip artists, either. just look at nullsleep or starscream; their live shows will have accompanying visuals, but they're not necessary for them to be powerful live, OR to get their art across (even though it certainly does bring it to an amazing new plateau). it could certainly be construed that they take themselves seriously to some degree, and look at what they're accomplishing.
my point is, for music that isn't itself overly comical or grotesque (in the sherwood anderson, exaggerated sense), there's nothing wrong with taking yourself or your art seriously. hell, for a lot of people, the antics/art that you and i pull on stage or online respectively aren't even necessary to help an audience get engaged! but i totally agree that it helps, it just depends on your own music.

L-tron wrote:

just booked my ticket. maximum boner

DREAMS AND REALITY COALESCE INTO UTOPIA. heart

Lazerbeat wrote:
likeluke wrote:

instead of affirming--or straight up relishing in--the outsider nature of chip, we need to take ourselves at least SLIGHTLY seriously as musicians; otherwise, chip might as well be wizard rock or nerdcore. (no offense to wizard rock or nerdcore enthusiasts on the board.)

This actually made me laugh out loud.

I would also add, godinpants IS australian (and from sydney) ridiculous comes with the territory.

OH HOW THE MIGHTY HATH LOL'D

um.
that response wasn't directed specifically at mister godinpants; i was actually just having a conversation about this exact topic a few days ago, oddly enough. i suppose that wasn't clear in my comment, GODINPANTS NO OFFENSE TO YOU EITHER BROUGH. heart

168

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

herr_prof wrote:

I think the key for real artists is the ability to produce a finish a song without being in that zone. Just facing up to the fact you suck and to KEEP WORKING. If the best artists waited for inspiration to strike theyd never get half as much of what they do done.

you're absolutely right, and of course the feeling of "being in the zone" isn't exclusive to people at a certain level either. all it means is that you are, at the moment, very inspired and can crank out a lot in a relatively short amount of time; generally, most people will have the same output but spanning much longer periods. case in point, i (as well as most people on here, i'm sure) have had songs sitting on laptops for almost a year, coming back to it every now and then until i could call it "done", as well as stuff that i just kind of tossed down to have the idea and never touched again. gotta try and stay prolific, yall.

wait. serious concern has just arisen.

what exactly is eyebeam's stance on byob?
(blip07 videos lead me to believe FUCKING GO FOR IT, but just want to get all my ducks in a row and make sure.)

sorry to take this thread off-course, but this struck me in a very particular way:

godinpants wrote:

I should also add that i think the chip scene (in particular in sydney really) doesn't really take itself too seriously. We all know it's ridiculous what we do, you guys seem to have taken what i'd call the "art school" approach and take your music quite seriously. I think this might be what's rubbing people the wrong way.

i don't think taking oneself seriously as a musician is a problem here. to say that "we know chipmusic is ridiculous" sort of keeps us in this "revenge of the nerds"-esque way of thinking of what we do; "yeah, this shit is really nerdy and not quite socially acceptable, so what?" why not take ourselves seriously enough to tell the world "this is actually a really awesome thing we do, all appearances aside"? instead of affirming--or straight up relishing in--the outsider nature of chip, we need to take ourselves at least SLIGHTLY seriously as musicians; otherwise, chip might as well be wizard rock or nerdcore. (no offense to wizard rock or nerdcore enthusiasts on the board.)

171

(51 replies, posted in General Discussion)

don't know how i missed this.

"the zone" that you are describing is in no way exclusive to video games. i'm sure you're seeing it in that context if only because you're using a game boy, but it is just a very focused mental state. it has nothing to do with not making mistakes, it has to do with inspiration and more or less being in the right place at the right time. same thing happens with music and any other instrument or program; i've definitely sat down on a laptop and had a song finished in a few hours because i was in "the zone". i know what you mean in describing the similarity to playing certain video games, but it's a feeling/place/THING that came long before the game boy even existed.

Derris-Kharlan wrote:
boaconstructor wrote:

Why do I have to live on the opposite end of the country? :'(

Hi, attending, from Australia.

TOLD AS FUCK tongue

DaPantz wrote:
herr_prof wrote:

So if you are ever going to play blip, and you want your confidence shattered two weeks beforehand, listen to some cTrix.

To be fair, this applies to "If you're ever going to make chipmusic" too.

yeah...yeah.
goddammit.

pixls wrote:
pixls wrote:

so who wants to put on another show?

didn't realize people responded hardcore to this





i was kidding.

likeluke (in another thread, but believes this applies forever) wrote:

...sarcasm is pretty fucking weird on the internet.

tour is done. we're home after being on the road for 51 days. thanks to anyone who came out to shows, bought a shirt, shook a hand, kept up on this thread. life-changing times, for certain.

okay, i'm gonna go lie down for a bit.

third to last show of the tour tonight in austin! and what's more, PARTY TIME! HEXCELLENT! added doing visuals!! WHATSUP NOW AUSTIN TX!!!