785

(141 replies, posted in General Discussion)

don't call it chipmusic for a start.

aren't you guys sponsored by nintendo?

ant1 wrote:
akira^8GB wrote:

All of Hubbard's non-C64 music sounds like generic rubbish.

*braces for impact*

All of Hubbard's C64 music sounds like generic rubbish too.

*braces for impact*

*braces for impact with Simmons drum solo*

legendary

nitro2k01 wrote:

Now I'm kind of curious. Are there any preserved examples of pre-computer Hubbard music?

yeah there are mp3s floating about of Chimera and Formula 1 he did on a 4-track,  See c64.com

790

(81 replies, posted in General Discussion)

akira^8GB wrote:
DKSTR wrote:

its no use to hide behind gimmick-ery instruments or retro imagenery

I think this is what happens with most of the people who have entered "chipmusic" in recent times (2007 onward?). It's all about this. some times I found acts that detriment their good music by basing their "sales pitch" entirely on this gimmicky bullshit tht has grown old long ago.

And then the forgiveness aforementioned gives them a frame of leniency that is no good in forming as a proper musician who performs live. The only way you can possibly become good at that is by playing the most varied crowds possible, and have as many rough situations as possible too.

PS: DKSTR you were number 1 in Riga last October wink

agreed, the retro thing has got to stop.  and bleating on about the hardware they use, save it for Future Music or something.

the added surprise is great, trust me.

792

(52 replies, posted in General Discussion)

back once again for the renegade master
(does not contain renegade master)

this thread might have some links.

PRESS START
PRETEND
PROFIT

795

(16 replies, posted in General Discussion)

thanksgiving (lsdj/clip/1xturkey/1xdmg/2xpumpkinpie/need cc)

796

(10 replies, posted in Releases)

only ant1 makes it possible

797

(52 replies, posted in General Discussion)

SHARING YOUR CHIPMUSIC PAGE WITH OTHER CHIP MUSICIANS ON A CHIPMUSIC FORUM FOR CHIPMUSICIANS KEEPING IT REAL.

798

(73 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Hmm.. I dunno, aesthetically people have been using the basic waveforms as long as there has been the ability to generate them.   What makes chip sound 'chip' is the waveforms and some manipulation techniques that were evolved on synthesizers (such as arpeggio and vibrato), developed way before any of the devices we'd commonly describe as chipmusic devices.  As can be seen from the many early copies of classical pieces (how many 'Switched on Bach' clones are on c64?) and electronic tracks (such as Jarre, Kraftwerk, Gershon Kingsley), chipmusic authors were trying to get the sound of synthesizers onto their home computers. While it's evolved from that point since, we are basically a subset of the synthesizer generation.   I mean, as an example Raymond Scott was doing this in the '50s and it basically sounds like SID music:

Where it has evolved is in the use of digital samples with the waveforms, now that is a move away from the basic elements.

Jellica: I think it's Flash Gordon. [edit: ahh, yeah sorry the bassline is Wizball.  there's a bit of sampling from Turbo Outrun as well)

you can also set it to render by instrument so you can mix tracks externally.

XMPlay , set Output device to "Encoder - Lame", put all your tracks in the playlist and click play.  (you have to put lame.exe from the LameEnc encoder in the same folder)