209

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Faking Amnesia wrote:

I'll send a couple new tracks your way once I get them recorded today or tomorrow.

Sweet! smile

210

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Excited about what I hear from the submissions!

211

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Xuriik wrote:

Hey, wait, so is this two tracks per artist? I have a track I made for a halloween compilation (Not exclusively chip, not spec work at all) which I could throw at this.

I say up to two per artist. I accept fakebit and chip-sounding pieces as well as full on chipmusic

212

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Telerophon wrote:

If I just named the thing, I guess I'd better have a track in it. wink

Makes sense to me big_smile whoo

213

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Victory Road wrote:

should be good then, i may add another myself

That would be much appreciated smile

214

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Victory Road wrote:

if history is anything to go by then i doubt more than 10 will submit anyway :v

I think I will have more than 10, I have been contacted 6-8 times, and I am verbally communicating maybe 2-3 tracks in. Plus my content

215

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

ant1 wrote:

i think you should only chose the 10 best submissions and you should get as many people as possible to submit artwork and only chose one cover

that way your comp will be higher quality

10 is not enough, maybe 15? Between 10 and 15...

One piece of artwork, that's probly for the best. I just want it to have to do with Spec Work

216

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Victory Road wrote:

definitely worth a shot after a finished compo is ready to be released.

I was thinking about doing that, and talking to them about spec art. Maybe do some kind of showcase with it?

217

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Should I try to get the no!spec crew in on this?

218

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Have you guys heard about the meow army? Creepy

219

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Auxcide wrote:

*pops in*
Pxl-bot 1 year later comp. (Because I was in it)

The mark of a good compilation, the real deal maker for me, is track order. Make sure to put some time in it.
Good luck with this though. I imagine some funny takes on the tapes on chains for cover art.

I care about that too! I was planning on Strong Suit and I to work together on the order. Espically with the eclectic mix of tracks.

You should submit, just sayin' wink

220

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Xuriik wrote:

I listen to (as in more than once) a few compilations.

The nanoloop compilation and the vocal compo are some of my favorites. The Mario Paint comp had some gems.

Which nanoloop comp?

There are lots of good chip compilations!
Chip=win, iPhone nanoloop posse, Chiptuned rockman, nanoloop2008, Italian 8-bit for Japan, chip for cancer... A truckload of golden compilations! There are more bad ones though

221

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Spec Work. This I'd deeper than I intended it to be. I like it.

What about spec work artwork? Hmmmm?

222

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Decktonic wrote:

I have two recommendations:

1. have a look at this: http://www.no-spec.com/about/

2. encourage artists to submit songs that were essentially done as spec work and never used... e.g. songs for games that were never finished, etc.

That would be cool if I did that! But I already have submissions. I have some of that stuff i might include.

If anyone has any, please submit!

223

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

bryface wrote:

if it's "spec work", should it include a piece or .txt file about what spec work is, why this album came into being, and why artists should be wary of it?  let's entertain AND educate!

Yes!!

224

(68 replies, posted in Collaborations)

Decktonic wrote:

I won't be submitting but just sayin'

You could submit... If you wanted to. It does not need to be exclusive material