Some of the early Casio boards used analog drums but they switched to PCM samples fairly quickly. I just looked up the board on Tablehooters and found this at this page: http://weltenschule.de/TableHooters/Casio_PT-80.html

"simple analogue percussion with transistor noise (base, low tom, mid tom, high tom, snare, open & closed hihat}"

So it looks like you're correct, they are analog. Personally I would still sample, please don't kill any more of these sweet little keyboards, but it's up to you of course. Have fun!

On a similar note, if you're trying to explore electronics, you might try building your own simple drum machine with individual circuits for each drum voice, it can be very simple with just a few parameters per voice, and it does not need to have a sequencer or anything like that built in, just a MIDI interface to trigger each voice. I recommend this over modifying the Casio, and you'll have better sounding drums too!!!

This sounds like a serious project that has no benefit at all over just sampling the drums into Ableton or any DAW you like and making a drum rack. Or, sample the drums into a device like the Digitakt and sequence them that way. Or, use a classic rack sampler and load in samples of the drums to have them addressable over MIDI. There are a million easier ways to have the exact same drum sounds addressable over MIDI, and since they aren't editable drum sounds, just PCM samples inside the Casio, there is no benefit to having them play on the machine itself. It's all samples either way. If your bends are affecting the drum sounds, then just sample each drum sound with a bunch of different versions, clean and glitched, and have them all sliced up. If you use something like the Digitakt you'll be able to manipulate the samples with filters, bit-reduction, glitching, overdrive, delays, etc and you'll have lots of fun. If you use long samples that are built from the same drum sound but many versions of it in the Digitakt, you can set an LFO to manipulate the sample start point and get a different version of the drum sound each time it triggers in your sequence. That would be WAY more fun than fucking around with an old Casio (I love old Casios), leave that thing alone and don't drill a bunch of holes in it to produce sounds that are mostly unusable. Feel free to prove that last bit wrong with a video of your bent Casio sounding super rad, proper line-out audio please... You said "any advice please" and that's my advice.

Each Volca sequencer is different, but each one does store sequences actually. You should get one if you've never used one of those either, they are very fun and have really immediate sequencers for jamming.

And yes, NL is much different than Volcas of course and this new handheld version looks extremely full featured, the sequencer in each version of NL is much more powerful than any Volca sequencer in most ways, but that is because it's extremely tightly integrated with the synth engine(s).

@Orgia Nah man I think you're applying my statement too broadly, and I didn't mean it combatively. I'm part of that "modders community" after all. You said earlier in this thread that you have never used nanoloop... so how do you know how intuitive it is versus a Volca? I would say that the NL interface is really wonderful and probably my favorite out of all my gear, but certainly the Volca interface is much simpler and more intuitive due to clear labeling and simple layout. NL interface is very minimalist, you definitely need to do some reading of the manual when first starting.

Are you thinking you would be able to mod this new handheld to use the full sequencer with multiple outs, note and parameter data that is sent out as CV, etc?

I suggested a Volca for a modular sequencer because they're inexpensive and I know that people have done simple MIDI out mods that allow you to use the nice multi-part sequencer with a modular, assuming you've got a MIDI to CV module. Not that I've done this personally, so take it with a grain of salt.

@Orgia I think you're misunderstanding what the purpose of nanoloop is. Wouldn't a modified Volca be a good fit if you're looking for something like this (a modular sequencer) for cheap?

Pledged, everyone on this forum should get in on this. Complete no-brainer at the price, I was shocked by how affordable it is.

7

(14 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)

Totally. Any other Oregonians on the board?

8

(14 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)

Has anyone tried using their Digitakt to control and sequence a DMG running mGB? This really seems like a match made in heaven, and I'm planning on picking up a Digitakt very soon....

Brought nanoloop home for the holidays. It was a great choice. I considered throwing my minilogue in the truck with me too but thought it was overkill. Wish I had, could be running nanoloop through the audio in.

Will a mod please sticky this thread?

edit: much thanks

oliver wrote:

How do you like the matte finish compared to the glossy one of nl one?

I love it, feels very futuristic. It's like something out of Neuromancer. Got caught up with it last night, looked at the clock and 2 hours had passed.. Oh, and the update installed just fine for me.

Is the Mono supported in the browser-based update manager already? If not, how did you update?

Got mine yesterday... and it's amazing. The cart is TINY. Looking forward to the full manual, but until then I'll puzzle things out. You did an awesome job Oliver. I can't help but wish this had been available back when I got my first DMG in 93...

If you haven't purchased one of these yet, what are you waiting for?!

Gala... very nice. My anticipation grows.

Double post...

I've been prowling craigslist for a cheap TI for weeks now. Can't wait to try this!