Offline
Lake Titicaca

I've heard some music made by students who graduated with 1st degrees in music from the best universities.

They had a lot of quite sophisticated sounding terminology when they were talking about music.

However, when I listened to their recordings it was just a bunch of out of tune sounding squeals and squeaks.

Plus they couldn't even understand gameboys.

Offline
Lake Titicaca
chunter wrote:
MaxDolensky wrote:

That's what the whole thread has been about.

My impression is that this thread was created when it should have been a direct message. If Protodome answers the 3 flats question, he deserves the "more patient than I" award, if there is one. Is there one?

No.

Offline
Brighton/Southampton
JaffaCakeMexica wrote:

I've heard some music made by students who graduated with 1st degrees in music from the best universities.

They had a lot of quite sophisticated sounding terminology when they were talking about music.

However, when I listened to their recordings it was just a bunch of out of tune sounding squeals and squeaks.

Plus they couldn't even understand gameboys.

I would like to think I'm the exception to this rule, but uhh.. yeah, Gameboy music ain't my forte. I'm more of a NES guy tongue

Offline
Lake Titicaca

I'm down for whatevrr...
(mostly sunvox)

Offline
JaffaCakeMexica wrote:

I hope chipmusic can one day do what this keyboard can...its microtonal stuff, maybe you'd be interested. Pretty much impossible in any tracker software I know of.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=APtJsaPxNgo

Almost impossible to write sheet music for as well.

Neither is impossible. You can change the tuning increments of lots of trackers. Pretty sure someone has done microtonal stuff with LSDJ before by using a custom ROM or something (little-scale, maybe? this was a while ago)

As for the sheet music thing I've heard of one person using "colors" for the different tiny pitch increments for microtonal pieces. i.e. Cblue, Cgreen, etc. Pretty interesting, but far out there stuff.

You can definitely do microtonal stuff in trackers though.

Offline
United States

ant1 wrote a tcl script that tunes impulse tracker instruments to whatever sort of microtonal scale you want

you can't find it anywhere

Offline
Lake Titicaca
arlen wrote:
JaffaCakeMexica wrote:

I hope chipmusic can one day do what this keyboard can...its microtonal stuff, maybe you'd be interested. Pretty much impossible in any tracker software I know of.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=APtJsaPxNgo

Almost impossible to write sheet music for as well.

Neither is impossible. You can change the tuning increments of lots of trackers. Pretty sure someone has done microtonal stuff with LSDJ before by using a custom ROM or something (little-scale, maybe? this was a while ago)

As for the sheet music thing I've heard of one person using "colors" for the different tiny pitch increments for microtonal pieces. i.e. Cblue, Cgreen, etc. Pretty interesting, but far out there stuff.

You can definitely do microtonal stuff in trackers though.

Yes, I saw that littlescale video in which he had created a custom rom for nanoloop using hex editor.
This microtonal kind of stuff is the future. We can return to the genius stylings of many indian composers. Actually, come to think of it you can do absolute frequencies in sunvox as well...havent got my head around it yet though, but..it will be mine, oh yes, it will be mine.

Last edited by JaffaCakeMexica (Apr 25, 2016 11:23 pm)

Offline
NC in the US of America

There have been at least 1 microtonal compos held on battleofthebits.org utilizing Famitracker.
http://battleofthebits.org/arena/OHC/1820/

Some of them are not possible in tracker arp commands because they go above 3 or 4 notes

Maybe not in a single tracker arp command on a single channel, but skillful alternating of arp commands or using a second channel to extend the chord is possible. And if you use a high speed setting it's possible to make arp chords as big as you want by simply entering the pitches in the note column rather than using arp commands. LSDj is pretty efficient with doing that with tables.

Offline

The future is debatable, but I don't see microtonal music as the future. I definitely don't see Western audiences ever getting into it. It'll remain an extreme niche like harsh noise and other areas of music that are far beyond what mass audiences enjoy.

Sure it's neat, but it's very hard to digest and it's tough for your average joe to get out of the western tone structure headspace. Gettin off track here, though.

Offline
Lake Titicaca

I think PSPSEQ could do absolute frequencies as well.
Is it open source yet?

Offline
United States

while i predominantly agree with arlen i would also like to throw out some examples of microtonal music i love

brad smith / rainwarrior - in this new image - 5TET - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8XiIRLBqic
syzygys - a bao a qu - incl. 43-tone organ - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7i6Jsed-PA

it might be important to recognize that the aim of microtonality is sometimes to approximate the exact pitch relationships of different intervals and not to be wacky

Offline
jangler wrote:

while i predominantly agree with arlen i would also like to throw out some examples of microtonal music i love

brad smith / rainwarrior - in this new image - 5TET - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8XiIRLBqic
syzygys - a bao a qu - incl. 43-tone organ - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7i6Jsed-PA

it might be important to recognize that the aim of microtonality is sometimes to approximate the exact pitch relationships of different intervals and not to be wacky

Here's a weird indie pop band using microtonal instruments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9MjtfEQl_c

Also puredata (or max/MSP, they're similar) might be worth looking into for microtonal sorts of stuff. Could definitely pull off chip stuff using the basic waveforms and sampling for percussion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4t5B6nPQGg

Offline
Lake Titicaca

theremin, human voice, lapslide and violin are awesome microtonal instruments.

Last edited by JaffaCakeMexica (Apr 26, 2016 12:28 am)

Offline
Brunswick, GA USA
arlen wrote:

The future is debatable, but I don't see microtonal music as the future. I definitely don't see Western audiences ever getting into it. It'll remain an extreme niche like harsh noise and other areas of music that are far beyond what mass audiences enjoy.

Good examples I've heard in pop music sound like blue notes, borrow from Arabic or Indian styles, or are used for "movie" percussion.

In sample trackers, or any trackers that let you tune an instrument to a pitch, you can make duplicate instruments that are up and down a quarter tone. On VSTs or MIDI synthesizers, you can send a pitch bend instruction.

Offline
United States
arlen wrote:

Here's a weird indie pop band using microtonal instruments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9MjtfEQl_c

hey, cool!

also, wendy carlos's "beauty in the beast" is practically required listening for anyone with an interest in microtonal exploration

Offline
Lake Titicaca
MaxDolensky wrote:

Keys are near-meaningless in tracker music - it's computed like atonal music is - arps are all relative to 0 (base note), sharps are always, flats are omitted, etc. Trying to force tracker format into the foundation for your argument about what scales fit what chord is baseless - it's not in a musical context at all, it's an abstraction or reduction.

Keys are near meaningless in tracker music?
Here is a guide to staying in key for tracker peeps.

C Natural minor

C,   D,    D#,   F,   G,   G#,  A#
(I), (II), (iii), (IV), (V), (vi), (vii)

C min : C, D#, G (0, 3, 7), (I, iii, V)
C sus4 : C, F, G (0, 5, 7), (I, IV, V)
Cm7 :  C, D#, G, A# (0, 3, 7, A)
Ddim : D, F, G# (0, 3, 6), (II, IV, vi)
Dm7b5 : C, D, F, G# (0, 3, 6, A), (I, II, IV, vi)
D#Maj : D#, G, A# (0, 4, 7), (iii, V, vii)
D#sus4 : D#, G#, A# (0, 5, 7), (iii, vi, vii)
D#Maj7 : D, D#, G, A# (0, 4, 7, B), (II, iii, V, vii)
F min : C, F, G# (0, 3, 7), (I, IV, vi)
Fsus4 : C, F, A# (0, 5, 7), (I, IV, vii)
Fm7 : C, D#, F, G# (0, 3, 7, A), (I, iii, IV, vi)
Gmin : D, G, A# (0, 3, 7), (II, V, vii)
Gsus4 : C, D, G (0, 5, 7), (I, II, V)
Gm7 : D, F, G, A# (0, 3, 7, A), (II, IV, V, vii)
G#Maj : C, D#, G# (0, 4, 7), (I, iii, vi)
G#Maj7 : C, D#, G, G# (0, 4, 7, B), (I, iii, V, vi)
G#6th : C, D#, F, G# (0, 4, 7, 9), (I, iii, IV, vi)
A#Maj : D, F, A# (0, 4, 7), (II, IV, vii)
A#sus4 : D#, F, A# (0, 5, 7), (iii, IV, vii)
A#7th : D, F, G#, A# (0, 4, 7, A), (II, IV, vi, vii)

If anyone can find any mistakes or suggest any improvements please let me know.

Honestly, instead of wasting time with 'trial and error music' and then saying its jazz, use this system. It will save you precious time.