chipmusic.org is an online community in respect and relation to chip music, art and its parallels.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Totally 2 per table...... then you'd also be able to use 2 FX simultaneously in a particular pattern step.
Ah, that's quite a good point. I wasn't thinking along those lines but that makes sense.
*furiously rubs out pencil memory map*
Last edited by neilbaldwin (Jul 20, 2010 1:36 pm)
Yep I agree with bleo too. Also I think an LSDJ styled interface would be great!
2 FX per pattern (phrase) step and 1 FX per table step
Am I the only one who thinks any more LSDJ-anything is not a good idea?
Am I the only one who thinks any more LSDJ-anything is not a good idea?
cant really blame an interface type or program in specific if you dont like the resulting music 
even if you could, things you like can based off things you dont like (im not really into LSDJ, but i love LGPT)
I just *really* like the scrolling aspect of a tracker and as far as I know LSDJ doesn't scroll like a classic tracker should.
I just *really* like the scrolling aspect of a tracker and as far as I know LSDJ doesn't scroll like a classic tracker should.
haha, odd thing to be a deal breaker if you ask me, but ok...
If I'm to pull off this thing, the 4x refresh speed for the audio engine means screen display updating has to be kept to an absolute minimum.
Which currently is meaning it looks a *lot* like LSDJ. LOL
My point being - I don't *want* to make something like LSDJ but having wracked my brains on how to overcome the screen drawing issue, it's now pretty obvious why LSDJ is designed the way it is (to a certain extent)
ui aside, its really elegant way for dpad editing.. DONT FIGHT THE FORCE LUKE.
I just *really* like the scrolling aspect of a tracker and as far as I know LSDJ doesn't scroll like a classic tracker should.
Surely a minor detail. LSDJ *IS* a tracker.
and there's no need to scroll because it uses 16 step patterns.
Since I am a drum machine/step sequencer person, I usually limit my tracker to use 16-step patterns too, so no scrolling. It doesn't add or take anything from my experience when composing.
LSDJ has, as said before, the simplest, most elegant and userfriendly interface for d-pad driven machines.
Last edited by akira^8GB (Jul 21, 2010 8:17 pm)
RG wrote:I just *really* like the scrolling aspect of a tracker and as far as I know LSDJ doesn't scroll like a classic tracker should.
Surely a minor detail. LSDJ *IS* a tracker.
and there's no need to scroll because it uses 16 step patterns.Since I am a drum machine/step sequencer person, I usually limit my tracker to use 16-step patterns too, so no scrolling. It doesn't add or take anything from my experience when composing.
LSDJ has, as said before, the simplest, most elegant and userfriendly interface for d-pad driven machines.
Maybe he meant the sideways scrolling, the being able to see more than one channel on screen at a time thing. Which of course has absolutely nothing to do with D-Pads but more to do with screen resolution (which is understandable). It put me off LGPT for a while but I've been getting used to it recently.