so hot! I'm bumping some nice nasty noises up in here.
can't wait to load this up when i get home from work. exciting.
This is super cool! I'm really interested to see where this goes. Thank you!
wipes drool off face...
starts saving for a powerpak again ;D
pretty cool, at least as a proof-of-concept (not that you can really do anything with it at this point). interested to see how it'll be in practice.
I'd like to hear from anyone who has ideas for Pulsar. At the moment I'm planning to steal ideas from LSDJ - I told Johan and he's cool 
One of the big issues I need to address is the amount of screen updating per-frame because the synth engine will be refreshed 4 times per frame (as you can see). LSDJ has a much simpler screen layout than NTRQ so I need to head in that direction.
Any and all ideas welcome.
Quick poll for the LSDJ users:
Would you rather Pulsar had;
2 FX per pattern (phrase) step and 1 FX per table step
or
1 FX per pattern step and 2 FX per table step
(And don't say 2 FX each )
Quick poll for the LSDJ users:
Would you rather Pulsar had;
2 FX per pattern (phrase) step and 1 FX per table step
or
1 FX per pattern step and 2 FX per table step
(And don't say 2 FX each
2 FX per pattern (phrase) step and 1 FX per table step
but that's just me!
Well if nobody else chips in, I'll rename it MaynardTracker and you'll get my complete attention
Totally 2 per table. It's a no brainer. Tables with only one FX row is seriously gonna hinder sound design.
Also, if there's a command to fire up a particular table, like the LSDJ A command, then you'd also be able to use 2 FX simultaneously in a particular pattern step.