I don't have a Twitter. Should I?
Anything that takes your time off you making cool music, you shouldn't get
Looking forward to the gig this Friday, the album's cool!
chipmusic.org is an online community in respect and relation to chip music, art and its parallels.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
ChipMusic.org / Forums / Posts by akira^8GB
I don't have a Twitter. Should I?
Anything that takes your time off you making cool music, you shouldn't get
Looking forward to the gig this Friday, the album's cool!
Somebody has tried this with OSX?
I did try version 2, it didn't work.
Any news, Oliver?
Really looking forward to the gig, Stevens. This tune rocks, I'm really feeling it.
If you ever want remixes, give me a holler, I'd love to. Also, I will finish them, UNLIKE SOMEONE I KNOW ...
haha!
Kickass music AND gobsmackin' artwork? Fuckin' A.
Ah, no way man. If you don't come, I don't go to that.
Just jokin'
Incredible artwork.
Where are all the London people??? This shit's gonna be massive.
YEah... ok.
Even if the song doesn't "do it" for me, I can tell that whether the musician is skilled or not, and whether the song is skillfully made.
I have to disagree with this point, though (and on using the words "good" and "bad", I think that's the usual problem that irritates some people )
I don't know if it has to do with actual SKILLS, rather with EFFORT and EFFECT of that effort. They are different things.
The "skill rating" is something you can apply, but not people who don't make chip (or any) music. "Quality" permeates even to those who really can't tell if the person is "skillful" or not. Getting technical is not the way to define if there is an inherent "quality" in music or not.
I know at least one person whose tracker abilities are not what one would consider "skillful" yet he makes brilliant music of an enormous quality.
I think there IS a quality factor, regardless of how you like the output or not.
Quality is not "good song" or "bad song" or "i like it" or "i don't like it".
You can definitely tell when someone has invested some time and effort into making something, when someone has had training and studied about stuff and applies that to a composition. THAT is quality to me. It's the general sense of effort put into something.
There's also the sense of achievement. How well does a piece work in the environment it is supposed to be displayed at?
This sense of quality can be perceived even by an untrained listener, because these are universal values. I don't need to understand what the guy on stage is doing to know if there's been a process of development, learning, training, research and effort to make what I am hearing. You can also feel the vibe of what is going on. There's a certain energy that the author intended to pass along, because all this effort and work, creates energy.
Harmony, melody, rhythm... all technical terms known just to us, which don't really make sense outside of our bubble, yet the quality of the work permeates outside this bubble onto the common folk, demonstrating these are not the factors that create it.
At least this is how I think about quality. You can put this onto any other art expression. I have many examples in pictorial art of people whose work I totally dislike but I understand the quality and significance behind what they have done, and I really appreciate this.
one thing in particular that i think is that there are way more chip musicians in america and europe than australia, so statistically alone musicians in those countries have the bar set a lot higher for themselves.
This is a major fallacy, not statistics. Quantity does not imply quality, and no matter how many you have, doesn't mean the general bar is higher at all.
I'll have a look at the nlmidi software later today. It should be possible to port it to any platform that supports the MIDI device.
Did you manage to listen to my example file?
In Reaper you set up a timecode generator on a track and you can set some different options for the MTC such as where it takes the timebase from
Hmm... I know there are different methods of sending sync, and perhaps this interface is not liking the one Reaper uses. It's just a guess.
Do you have any other gear that could generate MIDI clock?
Although I tend to think your adapter might be faulty (as I said, should send sync to LSDJ even if in mGB mode), it's best to check every possibility.
You gotta fix that guy up!
Llamatron über alles! (it's for Amiga)
Voidrunner as second perhaps.
I send MIDI clock type: song.
maybe you are sending pattern?
Or the thing is just bugged, very possible.
Have you tried another DAW instead of Reaper? I am using Ableton Live.
My delays shouldn't happen for you on sync mode.
If you just need it to sync with LSDJ, it will work even if it is in mGB mode. Just try it, just make sure you sen ONLY MIDI SYNC to the device. Dunno about nanoloop, I suppose it would work too!
I think SYNC mode ia necessary if you happen to send something other than sync tothe GB, but why would you do that if you just have LSDJ or Nanoloop? In a MIDI chain I would understand this, but this device plugs to a USB port in a computer, and you can just talk directly to it and send to it what it needs. There are no other devices in that chain that might need other MIDI commands.
ChipMusic.org / Forums / Posts by akira^8GB