http://drinkify.org/Sp%C3%B6ka/
Worcestershire sauce...
33 Nov 9, 2011 2:25 pm
Re: disasterpeace mixed drink: totally refreshing [y/y] (16 replies, posted in General Discussion)
34 Nov 9, 2011 2:05 pm
Re: HEXAWE - Latest release: HEXAWE016_LIVE_@_SAVE_FILE_by_KEFF (106 replies, posted in Releases)
Haha, I don't really have a problem with the timelimit but more with the 500k restriction... 
35 Nov 8, 2011 7:10 pm
Re: Piggy Tracker Thread (798 replies, posted in LittleGPTracker)
POST THAT SHIT!
36 Nov 7, 2011 2:43 pm
Re: Your Links, Please (56 replies, posted in General Discussion)
37 Oct 13, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: PB048| Analog- Pxl-Bot Singles Competition Winner (5 replies, posted in Releases)
Bought for $2.78 (all I had left on my paypal)! Thanks for the .lsdsng files!
38 Sep 26, 2011 1:53 pm
Re: FS: MSDOS/SB16 COMP, ATARI 1040ST (11 replies, posted in Trading Post)
Argh, if only I would live in glorious US of A... 
39 Sep 12, 2011 9:11 pm
Re: [HK001] spöka - chillax (also hemligkaka *label) (11 replies, posted in Releases)
Analog wrote:
this is very nice! congrats!
Great to hear that from you! Thanks.
And yes, it's from the IKEA light. Although it actually means something too. ;D
40 Sep 9, 2011 10:27 pm
Re: [HK001] spöka - chillax (also hemligkaka *label) (11 replies, posted in Releases)
DKSTR wrote:
Good stuff!
Glad you liked it! 
41 Sep 8, 2011 10:10 am
Re: [HK001] spöka - chillax (also hemligkaka *label) (11 replies, posted in Releases)
Jay Tholen wrote:
Makes me think of Perdition City era Ulver. Stuff like Lost in Moments. Very good. Thanks for posting.
Glad you like it! I have to check out Ulver then! ;D
KeFF wrote:
This goes nicely with my morning coffee smile
That was my intention Thanks for listening!
42 Sep 7, 2011 12:44 am
Re: New netlabel looking for artists and music to sign/release (27 replies, posted in General Discussion)
PM'd you.
43 Sep 4, 2011 1:08 pm
Re: Music Video [dubstep techno] (3 replies, posted in Motion Graphics)
That was very relaxing!
44 Sep 1, 2011 9:45 pm
Re: NYC and Boston - Learn techniques from the dub masters! (7 replies, posted in General Discussion)
Damn, that is awesome!!! Lucky Americans.
45 Aug 31, 2011 10:04 am
Re: Optimal nanoloop set up [Questions] (39 replies, posted in Nintendo Handhelds)
I don't mind having only a couple of patterns to work with, actually. It enables me to make nice, repetitive Minimal Techno. Makes it easy to play live too. With LSDJ I always have too many patterns and I don't remember half of them which makes me fuck up when I play live...
And the fact that you can switch between songs without delay or stopping the music won me over.
46 Aug 30, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: WTB or Trade For: Musical Tracker? LSDJ, Nanoloop? (33 replies, posted in Trading Post)
Freedom of speech, yo!
47 Aug 30, 2011 7:56 pm
Re: empty 8/29/11 - W D U W S T S (9 replies, posted in Releases)
wedanced wrote:
e.s.c. wrote:"direct"? you mean besides all the effects?
nevermind, i see that you linked just to your front page, which is clearly not nanoloop
direct link to the actual mp3: http://tapedecktheory.com/wduwsts/media/music/empty.mp3lol
dood there are no effects at all i swear. direct recording from DS lite to computer. no joke. its all just volume play.
I think esc meant the video on your 'frontpage'. Got me confused too at first. ;D
48 Aug 30, 2011 6:37 pm
Re: WTB or Trade For: Musical Tracker? LSDJ, Nanoloop? (33 replies, posted in Trading Post)
Screamforme99 wrote:
thats true. But i thought the point of chip music was to use the inspiration from classic games you played as a kid to create music, on CLASSIC hardware. i always saw using an emulator to produce chiptune was defeating the purpose. The modifications werent necessary, your right. but it was a neat experiment. Look i understand all of your points. but i dont want not to be accepted just because im new to the genre.
I'm getting a bit tired of people saying that Chipmusic SHOULD AND ALWAYS WILL be made on the real hardware... Who gives a damn on what it's been made...
Anyways, if you think that you need a modded Gameboy to make music than that's fine. Who are we to judge.