eh, i guess i should have expected this to turn into the classic BUT WHAT IS CHIPTUNES??? discussion, but it wasn't my intent i promise
129 May 19, 2013 6:52 am
Re: Post-Chiptune artist identity. Your thoughts? (154 replies, posted in General Discussion)
130 May 18, 2013 8:37 pm
Re: Post-Chiptune artist identity. Your thoughts? (154 replies, posted in General Discussion)
^ this is exactly what im talking about, and the top comment... is also exactly what i was talking about. when electrohouse and dubstep had the huge buzz, quite a few well-liked chip artists bailed for that style, and yet still do chip tours/events and vaguely bill themselves as chip. and further, now that the guch had their big $ kickstarter, a lot of those same people are now suddenly making chiptune again XD Which again isnt some terrible thing, just amusing to watch!
I thought you were going to out people who left the scene and got famous (or didn't.)
that would be a very short (or very long) list indeed.
On an only tangentially related note, I seeded "The Reality Chipmusic Love Industry" ages ago when you asked for seeders and only recently got around to really listening to it as a whole. Totally worth the effort in seeding!
bawwww thanks jefff
131 May 18, 2013 7:22 am
Re: Post-Chiptune artist identity. Your thoughts? (154 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I guess what puzzles me is... why? From my perspective, if someone is looking for chip music and does happen to somehow stumble on this mislabeled artist, they're just going to go "uhhh, this isn't chiptune" and move along. but thats just me.
132 May 18, 2013 7:20 am
Topic: Post-Chiptune artist identity. Your thoughts? (154 replies, posted in General Discussion)
Chiptune is a dabblers genre to be sure, so many artists come and go of course. But something that I've found very interesting is that quite a few who were previously involved with the scene and "proper chiptune"* that have now "quit chiptune" or simply transitioned into other genres (mostly some form or another of EDM) still label themselves as "chiptune", do chip shows, etc., and generally carry on in a chiptune fashion despite supposedly being beyond all that.
Now I'm not passing judgement, nor is this aimed at anyone in particular (in fact I think its a good thing in certain regards and at the very least leads to a diversity of sound), but it is curious to me and I'm interested in other peoples thoughts on the matter.
133 May 17, 2013 8:14 am
Re: So I do interviews, and you can be interviewed, too! (55 replies, posted in General Discussion)
vouching for kuma. hes a good lad and has a fine head shape.
134 May 15, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: [US,NY] I/O Chip Music - Ultrasyd | Rockman | L-tron | Paris 16+ $8-10 (7 replies, posted in Past Events)
I can't believe I'm in SF for this'd FMLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
135 May 15, 2013 10:00 pm
Re: [US,NY] I/O Chip Music - Ultrasyd | Rockman | L-tron | Paris 16+ $8-10 (7 replies, posted in Past Events)
damn that is going to be a HOT ASS show
136 May 12, 2013 10:34 pm
Re: terrible chipmusic titles (134 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I'm obviously just still mad my shirt never came XD
137 May 12, 2013 10:27 pm
Re: terrible chipmusic titles (134 replies, posted in General Discussion)
I don't know how it's possible that this thread has gone 6 pages without someone mentioning "BRK"
I mean, no hate to BRK, but at this point it basically just means "haha I'm making a scene reference, Im cool right guys??"
138 May 10, 2013 7:02 am
Re: UBI065 Diad — Diad (22 replies, posted in Releases)
goddamnit where is that spongebob vid where patrick is on the phone with a radio DJ singing dimension reversing polarities?
great release of course
139 May 7, 2013 5:31 am
Re: Chiptunes = WTFLOL (cover EP) (5 replies, posted in Releases)
QUITE IMPRESSIVE
140 May 3, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Music theory question. (19 replies, posted in Audio Production)
its a little confusing to be sure. basically, the typical modern understanding of scales and harmony is different than how it was taught in the 1600s-1900s. the melodic minor is a way of easily conveying, in scale form, what was actually the "sound" of a V7-i progression (which is non-diatonic, or not "natural", to the minor scale) that, for whatever reason, classical ear loved so much. Similar to the picardy third, which was the practice of using a major chord resolution at the end of a minor (or modal) piece of music.
141 May 2, 2013 6:31 am
Re: Music theory question. (19 replies, posted in Audio Production)
if you are really interested in the study of scales (which is damn fascinating) i recommend these two books above all else:
Yusef Lateefs "repository of scales and melodic patterns", which covers a huge amount of ethnic and jazz melodic permutations
http://www.amazon.com/Repository-Scales
B000O9TN46
and Slonimsky's Thesaurus of Scales and Melodic Patterns, which essentially covers every possible scale, but from a more serialist approach of building permutations from interpolation of row clusters. still damn interesting:
142 May 2, 2013 6:26 am
Re: Music theory question. (19 replies, posted in Audio Production)
its not *really* a different scale going up and down, just that in traditional counterpoint, even if you were in a natural minor key you would still use a dominant 7th or some sort of tonicization before a cadence to the I chord, so in practice the approach notes of the melody would be that of major scale. but since nobody learns counterpoint, its easier to just explain it as "minor scale, with a #6 & #7 when approaching the tonic".
since its basically a progression rather than a scale you could say there are plenty others that are commonly used in western music, but most of them just fall into the general area of "well known melodies found in modal harmony, substitutions, pivot chords, etc." and are not awarded sexy scale status.
143 Apr 27, 2013 4:39 am
Re: shoutout to sketchman3 (11 replies, posted in General Discussion)
He's only doing one pew
depends on how many times you watch it loop