I didn't get to catch as many acts as I would have liked, but they were all awesome.  Also my friend George who spent the majority of time in Jamspace was marveling that he didn't hear any chip acts that were NOT incredible.  Seriously cream of the crop shit here.

1,074

(82 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Also dude, not to be age-ist or anything, but you're only 17.  I've done some fantastic things in my music career, but if I were to gauge where I was at 17 I'd be a complete musical failure whose greatest moment was not sucking at a high school talent show.   

Don't worry about making everything happen at once.  Get AWESOME at your craft.  Think you're pretty good? You still have a MILLION ways to get better as a musician, and it'll show.  There is no peaking.  TRUST ME.  If you're really a great musician, and if you keep at it, some cool things will happen to you.

1,075

(82 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Be awesome.

Have a lot of friends.

Get lucky.

1,076

(25 replies, posted in Audio Production)

Classical music is much better to listen to on the radio because I don't need to play volume jockey.   Personally, I like the most convenient-transparent listening environment so that I can really focus on the content rather than bullshit.

1,077

(164 replies, posted in Past Events)

I think I'll see what all the fuss is about.  You know, if there's beer that is.

1,078

(25 replies, posted in Audio Production)

wedanced wrote:

i find that the listener gets the best experience if the music volume is all the way down. the best part is  that by doing so you avoid all chances of clipping and spikes. silence is the new loud.

The listener gets the best experience when your track plays and he doesn't think about mixing or mastering whatsoever.  Mastering should be transparent, meaning, if they need to adjust their settings, or raise the volume, thats taking away focus from your COMPOSITION.

I master my songs so that if they're on a mix CD, or playlist, or car stereo or whatever, they fit in without any sort of jolt.  I also master them so the bass is sexy.  By the grace of god, LSDJ sounds huge enough on its own (provided your sound design is good) that you really only need to give it a tiny bit of love during mastering.  It's surprising really.  The complete lack of offensive high end frequencies helps immensely.

Here's the difference between my raw track and the mastered track.  I alternate back and forth.  What sounds better to you?

http://www.armcannon.com/danimal/danima … asters.mp3

1,079

(25 replies, posted in Audio Production)

lol loudness wars, I'm part of the problem.

1,080

(18 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Oh drunk threads, you so maudlin.  I guess I'm an "I LOVE YOU MAN" drunk.  But seriously that dude has those lovely jazzy progressions that all the prog dudes love, but he's so damn catchy that everyone else likes it too.

1,081

(18 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I heard he's dating wobblegirl

1,082

(18 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I think he's cheating at music.

1,083

(42 replies, posted in Audio Production)

I have ADAM A7Xs, they're mid-high end


I also have a KRK sub

The sub is really nice when composing on LSDJ, I can find bass tones in the wav channel that really thump.

1,084

(1 replies, posted in General Discussion)

yeah!

Hehe that would be awesome but I don't think my girlfriend who is flying with me would appreciate that big_smile

Fuck.  I'm flying to PAX East this day.

1,087

(81 replies, posted in General Discussion)

J. Arthur Keenes wrote:

I dig damn near anything with a harpsichord in it.

me too, but man that instrument needs more velocity layers

1,088

(81 replies, posted in General Discussion)

orchestra hits.  need them.  constantly.